IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v49y2025i1p126-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

STATE BUILDING IN CRISIS MANAGEMENT: Reflections on Statecraft from the Shanghai Lockdown

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Wang
  • Fulong Wu
  • Fangzhu Zhang

Abstract

The exceptional measures to combat the Covid‐19 pandemic have brought great potential for reconfiguring urban governance. To examine such potential, this article presents how the pandemic crisis was managed in Chinese neighbourhoods. Following a statecraft approach and using Shanghai as a case, we show how a citywide lockdown played out on the ground as a joint product of state apparatus and citizens. Drawing on discourse analysis of interviews, policy documents, and news reports, we probe into Shanghai's contextualized neighbourhood pandemic responses, particularly by emerging neighbourhood voluntary practices in crisis management. We examine how these practices were tactically incorporated into the state's overall responses to the pandemic through co‐production, co‐option and mobilization. Instead of co‐governance, we argue that the grassroots state orchestrates and steers community participation and volunteerism to reinforce grassroots statecraft and consolidate its role in (post‐) pandemic neighbourhood governance. Through exceptional crisis management measures, the state penetrates everyday life. This process has facilitated local state‐building in urban neighbourhoods, thereby manifesting, perpetuating, and expanding state‐centred governance trends that were established well before the onset of Covid.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Wang & Fulong Wu & Fangzhu Zhang, 2025. "STATE BUILDING IN CRISIS MANAGEMENT: Reflections on Statecraft from the Shanghai Lockdown," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 126-141, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:126-141
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13289
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:126-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.