IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v48y2024i1p74-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘BEST FOR FOODIES’: Food, Digital Media and Planetary Gentrification

Author

Listed:
  • Pascale Joassart‐Marcelli
  • Fernando J. Bosco

Abstract

Leisure activities, including place‐based food experiences, have become central to defining urban identities and branding places. Mobile and affluent urbanites’ search for authentic and cosmopolitan experiences is increasingly guided by corporate digital media such as apps and websites that direct them to previously ignored working‐class, ethnic and immigrant neighborhoods, which are being discursively and materially reconfigured to meet their needs, in turn causing the displacement of long‐time residents. We examine the relationship between food and gentrification through the lens of digital media, suggesting that they play an important role in shaping urban experiences and cities. Specifically, we investigate narratives produced by popular digital food media, not least websites and apps providing restaurant ratings and reviews, and their relationship to ongoing patterns of gentrification in Buenos Aires, Los Angeles and Paris. Using mixed methods that combine census data with ‘hybrid fieldwork’ in online and offline foodscapes, we identify some spatial patterns and key characteristics of food‐driven gentrification, highlighting the aestheticization of everyday life and its significance in encouraging and legitimizing planetary gentrification.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascale Joassart‐Marcelli & Fernando J. Bosco, 2024. "‘BEST FOR FOODIES’: Food, Digital Media and Planetary Gentrification," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 74-93, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:48:y:2024:i:1:p:74-93
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13212
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen Reese & Geoffrey Deverteuil & Leanne Thach, 2010. "‘Weak‐Center’ Gentrification and the Contradictions of Containment: Deconcentrating Poverty in Downtown Los Angeles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 310-327, June.
    2. D. Asher Ghertner, 2015. "Why gentrification theory fails in 'much of the world'," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 552-563, August.
    3. Isabelle Anguelovski, 2015. "Healthy Food Stores, Greenlining and Food Gentrification: Contesting New Forms of Privilege, Displacement and Locally Unwanted Land Uses in Racially Mixed Neighborhoods," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1209-1230, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olabisi S. Obaitor & Marion Stellmes & Tobia Lakes, 2024. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Gentrification Processes in Intracity Slums in the Lagos Megacity," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Sai Balakrishnan, 2019. "Recombinant Urbanization: Agrarian–urban Landed Property and Uneven Development in India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 617-632, July.
    3. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    4. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    5. Jessica Parish, 2023. "Fiduciary Activism From Below: Green Gentrification, Pension Finance, and the Possibility of Just Urban Futures," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 414-425.
    6. Seth Schindler & Jonathan Silver, 2019. "Florida in the Global South: How Eurocentrism Obscures Global Urban Challenges—and What We Can Do about It," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 794-805, July.
    7. Jeff Garmany & John Burdick, 2021. "‘An open secret’: Public housing and downward raiding in Rio de Janeiro," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2798-2813, October.
    8. Jane Battersby, 2019. "The Food Desert as a Concept and Policy Tool in African Cities: An Opportunity and a Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Mary Lawhon & Yaffa Truelove, 2020. "Disambiguating the southern urban critique: Propositions, pathways and possibilities for a more global urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 3-20, January.
    10. Indivar Jonnalagadda & Ryan Stock & Karan Misquitta, 2021. "TITLING AS A CONTESTED PROCESS: Conditional Land Rights and Subaltern Citizenship in South India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 458-476, May.
    11. Renan Almeida & Pedro Patrício & Marcelo Brandão & Ramon Torres, 2022. "Can economic development policy trigger gentrification? Assessing and anatomising the mechanisms of state-led gentrification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 84-104, February.
    12. Christopher Rick & Jeehee Han & Spencer Shanholtz & Amy Ellen Schwartz, 2022. "Examining the Link Between Gentrification, Children’s Egocentric Food Environment, and Obesity," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 245, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    13. Allen J. Scott, 2019. "City-regions reconsidered," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 554-580, May.
    14. Anders Blok, 2020. "Urban green gentrification in an unequal world of climate change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2803-2816, November.
    15. Erin McElroy, 2020. "Digital nomads in siliconising Cluj: Material and allegorical double dispossession," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3078-3094, November.
    16. Ellen van Holstein, 2020. "Strategies of self-organising communities in a gentrifying city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1284-1300, May.
    17. Matthias Bernt, 2016. "Very particular, or rather universal? Gentrification through the lenses of Ghertner and López-Morales," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 637-644, July.
    18. Bengt Andersen & Hannah Eline Ander & Joar Skrede, 2020. "The directors of urban transformation: The case of Oslo," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(7), pages 695-713, November.
    19. Christian Schmid & Ozan Karaman & Naomi C Hanakata & Pascal Kallenberger & Anne Kockelkorn & Lindsay Sawyer & Monika Streule & Kit Ping Wong, 2018. "Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 19-52, January.
    20. Alan Smart & Josephine Smart, 2017. "Ain't Talkin' ‘Bout Gentrification: The Erasure of Alternative Idioms of Displacement Resulting from Anglo-American Academic Hegemony," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 518-525, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:48:y:2024:i:1:p:74-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.