IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v46y2022i6p954-972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

URBAN NOSTALGIA, REGENERATION, AND CULTURAL MONOPOLY RENT: ‘Nanjing 1912’ and Its Branding Bubbles

Author

Listed:
  • Cassidy I‐Chih Lan
  • Jianglong Chen

Abstract

Nostalgia has become an important aspect of culture‐led urban regeneration in advanced cities. Chinese cities have also experienced this tendency because many local states have used nostalgia as an instrument to brand their cities and promote business opportunities. However, culture‐led regeneration has resulted in the dilemma of cultural commodification and branding bubbles, as this approach is subordinate to capital circulation and property revitalization. We translate the Marxist idea of monopoly rent proposed by David Harvey into culture‐led regeneration by focusing on the influence of urban nostalgia on the production of the built environment and place distinctiveness for capital accumulation. Against the background of national capital in the Republic of China and its current fervor for culture‐led regeneration in what is known as the ‘Republican style’, in this article we explore the case of Nanjing 1912 to examine how urban cultural monopoly rent is produced through the project, and scrutinize its dilemma of over‐replication. Although nostalgia is associated with culture, creativity and history, Nanjing 1912's regeneration is underpinned by economic revenue and by investors experiencing branding bubbles as they tried to upscale the 1912 brand to Nanjing and its neighboring cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Cassidy I‐Chih Lan & Jianglong Chen, 2022. "URBAN NOSTALGIA, REGENERATION, AND CULTURAL MONOPOLY RENT: ‘Nanjing 1912’ and Its Branding Bubbles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 954-972, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:46:y:2022:i:6:p:954-972
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13126
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    2. Bob Jessop & Ngai-Ling Sum, 2000. "An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong's Emerging Strategies in and for (Inter)Urban Competition," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(12), pages 2287-2313, November.
    3. Alan W. Evans, 1991. "On Monopoly Rent," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 67(1), pages 1-14.
    4. Su, Rui & Bramwell, Bill & Whalley, Peter A., 2018. "Cultural political economy and urban heritage tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 30-40.
    5. Greig Charnock & Thomas F. Purcell & Ramon Ribera-Fumaz, 2014. "City of Rents: The limits to the Barcelona model of urban competitiveness," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 198-217, January.
    6. Elvin Wyly & Markus Moos & Daniel Hammel & Emanuel Kabahizi, 2009. "Cartographies of Race and Class: Mapping the Class‐Monopoly Rents of American Subprime Mortgage Capital," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 332-354, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Callum Ward & Manuel B Aalbers, 2016. "Virtual special issue editorial essay: ‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1760-1783, July.
    2. Fulong Wu, 2016. "China's Emergent City-Region Governance: A New Form of State Spatial Selectivity through State-orchestrated Rescaling," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1134-1151, November.
    3. Albert S. Fu & Martin J. Murray, 2014. "Glorified Fantasies and Masterpieces of Deception on Importing Las Vegas into the ‘New South Africa’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 843-863, May.
    4. Nestor Garza & Colin Lizieri, 2019. "An empirical approach to urban land monopoly: A case study of the city of Barranquilla, Colombia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(10), pages 1931-1950, August.
    5. Weiming Tong & Kevin Lo & Pingyu Zhang, 2020. "Land Consolidation in Rural China: Life Satisfaction among Resettlers and Its Determinants," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Sahil Singh Jasrotia & Manoj Kumar Kamila & Vinod Kumar Patel, 2023. "Impact of Sustainable Tourism on Tourist’s Satisfaction: Evidence from India," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(2), pages 173-189, May.
    7. Melissa Heil, 2022. "Debtor spaces: Austerity, space, and dispossession in Michigan’s emergency management system," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(5), pages 966-983, August.
    8. Jianfa Shen, 2010. "Cooperation and Competition Between Cities: Urban Development Strategies in Hong Kong and Shenzhen," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl (ed.), Economic Strategies for Mature Industrial Economies, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Jihwan Kim, 2018. "Dissonance between formal and informal housing capital: The case of Korea," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1171-1188, September.
    10. Nurit Alfasi & Talia Margalit, 2014. "The challenge of regulating private planning initiatives," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 13, pages 269-294, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Taiyang Zhong & Xianjin Huang & Lifang Ye & Steffanie Scott, 2014. "The Impacts on Illegal Farmland Conversion of Adopting Remote Sensing Technology for Land Inspection in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Stephanie Farmer & Chris D Poulos, 2019. "The financialising local growth machine in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1404-1425, May.
    13. Kara, Alper & Zhou, Haoyong & Zhou, Yifan, 2021. "Achieving the United Nations' sustainable development goals through financial inclusion: A systematic literature review of access to finance across the globe," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    15. Beverley Mullings, 2022. "Racial capitalism, coloniality and the financialization of Caribbean remittances," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 744-760, June.
    16. Eran Ben-Joseph, 2009. "Commentary: Designing Codes: Trends in Cities, Planning and Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2691-2702, November.
    17. Antoine Guironnet, 2019. "Cities on the global real estate marketplace: urban development policy and the circulation of financial standards in two French localities," Post-Print halshs-02297204, HAL.
    18. Lin Zhang & Yiting Zhao & Yuan Liu & Jinfang Qian, 2021. "Does the Land Price Subsidy Still Exist against the Background of Market Reform of Industrial Land?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-31, September.
    19. Wang, Yuan & Hui, Eddie Chi-man, 2017. "Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 196-215.
    20. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2018. "Measuring the Performance in Creative Cities: Proposal of a Multidimensional Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:46:y:2022:i:6:p:954-972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.