IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v46y2022i4p594-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘LET'S BEAT CRIME TOGETHER’: Corporate Mobilizations for Security in Karachi

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Gayer
  • Sophie Russo

Abstract

The Citizens‐Police Liaison Committee (CPLC) was launched in 1990 by a group of Karachi‐based industrialists, with the aim of improving police performance and restoring public order in Pakistan's major business hub. Over the years, CPLC members developed a unique informational capital as well as analytical and operational skills, which were recognized as a form of expertise by law enforcement agencies and contributed to the entrenchment of the organization into the security state. This corporate mobilization for security, understood as a form of collective action organized by entrepreneurs for the protection of their lives, properties and economic activities, imposed its writ in the city's industrial zones. The expert system of the organization was then repurposed toward the surveillance of factory workers, the defense of industrial order and the regulation of circulatory flows across the estates. By engaging with the growing body of work on the new military urbanism through the lens of the risk‐theory literature on policing, the article aims to contribute to ongoing debates about the transformations of labor relations and urban citizenship under a new regime of securitization fed by ever‐thicker chains of interdependence between capital and coercion.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Gayer & Sophie Russo, 2022. "‘LET'S BEAT CRIME TOGETHER’: Corporate Mobilizations for Security in Karachi," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 594-613, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:46:y:2022:i:4:p:594-613
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13084
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Marcuse, 2006. "Security or Safety in Cities? The Threat of Terrorism after 9/11," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 919-929, December.
    2. Stephen Graham, 2012. "When Life Itself is War: On the Urbanization of Military and Security Doctrine," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 136-155, January.
    3. Nausheen H Anwar & Amiera Sawas & Daanish Mustafa, 2020. "‘Without water, there is no life’: Negotiating everyday risks and gendered insecurities in Karachi’s informal settlements," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1320-1337, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeremy Németh & Justin Hollander, 2010. "Security Zones and New York City's Shrinking Public Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 20-34, March.
    2. Alexandra Abello Colak & Melanie Lombard & Valeria Guarneros-Meza, 2023. "Framing urban threats: A socio-spatial analysis of urban securitisation in Latin America and the Caribbean," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(14), pages 2741-2762, November.
    3. Lloyd Chigusiwa & George Kembo & Terrence Kairiza, 2023. "Drought and social conflict in rural Zimbabwe: Does the burden fall on women and girls?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 178-197, February.
    4. Rob Roggema, 2019. "Design for Disruption: Creating Anti-Fragile Urban Delta Landscapes," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 113-122.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:46:y:2022:i:4:p:594-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.