IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v42y2018i6p986-1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asĺ No (Not Like This): Resisting Postpolitics on Mexico City's Avenida Chapultepec

Author

Listed:
  • Ben A. Gerlofs

Abstract

Building on roughly ten months of ethnographic and archival research, this article examines successful resistance to a planned redevelopment project along Avenida Chapultepec, one of Mexico City's historic boulevards. Local residents and their allies objected not only to the specifics of the project but also to its planning process, in which citizen input was foregrounded but extremely limited. This case illustrates the instantiation of a ‘postpolitical condition’ in Mexico City, a situation in which any opportunity for dissensus has been foreclosed and ironically replaced by a growing set of carefully managed participatory schemes and an ever‐greater rhetorical commitment to democratization. The public contest over the so‐called Corredor Cultural Chapultepec effectively demonstrates two claims I seek to advance in this article. The first is that strategic vulnerabilities of such political orders can be effectively sought in their conditions of emergence or the contextually specific ways that such orders consolidate political power. The second is that in seeking to elucidate and challenge these conditions, resistance must account for the ways in which certain ‘partition[ings] of the sensible’ (Rancière, ) operate at the quotidian level of attitudes, norms and routines to assign and continually reproduce the places and roles of urban citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben A. Gerlofs, 2018. "Asĺ No (Not Like This): Resisting Postpolitics on Mexico City's Avenida Chapultepec," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 986-1007, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:6:p:986-1007
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12659
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.12659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:6:p:986-1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.