IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v42y2018i2p334-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics of The Ring: Limits to Public Participation in Engineering Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Hillier

Abstract

How engineering in the context of urban socio†environmental challenges is practically and effectively mobilized has been the subject of some debate. Numerous professional bodies have encouraged engineers to approach socio†environmental issues through increased engagement with, and accountability to, the public through effective participatory practices. This article presents a close empirical analysis of a major engineering project in London to argue that engineering has a more complex relationship with social, political and environmental conditions than the idealistic participatory conception supposes. In fact, the spatial, technical and economic arrangements of engineering practice may limit the potential for public participation. Through a detailed analysis of the example of the London Water Ring Main (from around 1988 to 1994), this article shows how myriad sometimes conflicting engineering issues and responsibilities interfered with key elements of effective participation. Therefore, although increased public engagement in engineering may be desirable in theory, substantial professional, institutional and political change may have to occur before this is possible in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Hillier, 2018. "Politics of The Ring: Limits to Public Participation in Engineering Practice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 334-356, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:2:p:334-356
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12523
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.12523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianwang Wang & Lan Luo & Rina Sa & Wei Zhou & Zihan Yu, 2023. "A Quantitative Analysis of Decision-Making Risk Factors for Mega Infrastructure Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Di Marco, Antonio, 2023. "Water democracy under European Union law: Requiring participatory services management," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:2:p:334-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.