IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i2p507-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quandaries of Trying to Do Good—The Adequacy of the WHO FENSA Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Habib Benzian
  • Eugenio Beltrán‐Aguilar
  • Richard Niederman
  • Arthur Caplan

Abstract

The World Health Organization's (WHO) Framework of Engagement with Non‐State Actors (FENSA), established in 2016, is designed to enhance transparency, impartiality, and conflict‐of‐interest safeguards by setting rigorous guidelines for WHO's interactions with private entities, particularly those in high‐risk industries such as tobacco, alcohol, and arms. This paper briefly reviews the implementation and impact of FENSA, observing that, despite these safeguards, its application in academic contexts poses specific challenges. Universities, often reliant on diverse funding sources, may find the rules restrictive and misaligned with independent funding needs. The creation of the WHO Foundation in 2020 further complicates this landscape by enabling engagements with previously restricted private sector entities through an “arm's length” model. The authors advocate for a reassessment of FENSA to resolve inconsistencies and support essential academic collaborations, while upholding WHO's commitment to ethical standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Habib Benzian & Eugenio Beltrán‐Aguilar & Richard Niederman & Arthur Caplan, 2025. "Quandaries of Trying to Do Good—The Adequacy of the WHO FENSA Regulations," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 507-509, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:507-509
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3866
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:507-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.