IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i2p381-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living in the Minds of Others: How Pudor and Social Judgements Affect Women's Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in Mozambique?

Author

Listed:
  • Gefra Fulane
  • Maria Major
  • Cesaltina Lorenzoni

Abstract

Mozambique introduced its cervical cancer screening programme in 2009, but only 3.5% of the target women participate in screening annually. While previous research has focused on provision and access to service, and women's cognitive barriers to screening, this study explores the emotional factors, particularly pudor, that affect women's acceptance of screening. Using an institutional work perspective, we conducted an explanatory case study involving documental analysis and primary data collection through semi‐structured interviews, focus group discussions, direct observations, and informal conversations with 121 participants, including women, health professionals, and family members from Xai‐Xai in Southern Mozambique. Our findings reveal that pudor, an emotion tied to a deep‐seated sense of reserve rooted in patriarchal culture and masculine dominance, plays a significant role in limiting women's motivation to participate in screening. This emotion, shaped by social and cultural norms around privacy, intimacy, and sexuality, leads women to view cervical cancer screening as culturally unacceptable, often responding with attitudes emphasising modesty and avoidance. These findings underscore the importance of addressing emotional factors in health care strategies and considering the sociocultural context that influences health behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Gefra Fulane & Maria Major & Cesaltina Lorenzoni, 2025. "Living in the Minds of Others: How Pudor and Social Judgements Affect Women's Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in Mozambique?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 381-390, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:381-390
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3881
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:381-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.