Author
Listed:
- Franziska Saxer
- Christoph Hatz
- Werner Vach
- the PROFI Study Group
Abstract
Objectives Waiting for surgery is a disconcerting experience. It can have a negative impact on patients' outcomes and length of stay (LOS) as driver for treatment costs. Process‐optimisation may be a strategy to improve quality and cost‐efficacy. The study investigates the correlation between waiting for hip fracture surgery and patient characteristics, organisational variables, outcomes, LOS, and the distribution of waiting times and LOS over time, including cost estimates. Thereby the study aims to identify the potential for organisational improvements with respect to managing the waiting time. Methods Ten‐year routine health data (patient characteristics and follow‐up information) and process‐indicators that is, waiting time and LOS from a Swiss trauma‐centre were analysed retrospectively. Cost‐estimates were calculated based on Swiss diagnosis related groups and daily costs to evaluate hospital revenues. Results In total, 2572 patients aged ≥60 years with low‐energy hip fractures were included. Waiting times >48 h were associated with sub‐optimal outcomes. Over the years long waiting times decreased. This reduction was not reflected by a reduction in LOS which remained stable around 10 days, primarily driven by late discharge to in‐patient rehabilitation. Reimbursement persisted at an average revenue in the low 4–5‐digit range, depending on implant costs. Conclusions While there has been a reduction of waiting times, this has not translated into a reduction of LOS or potential savings in health care costs, due to the various dependencies along the patient journey. Managing waiting times may be an area for improvement, increasing cost‐efficacy, especially since long waiting times are still associated with inferior outcomes and LOS.
Suggested Citation
Franziska Saxer & Christoph Hatz & Werner Vach & the PROFI Study Group, 2025.
"Waiting for surgery after hip fracture—Health and/or economic risk?,"
International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 57-85, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:1:p:57-85
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3851
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:1:p:57-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.