IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v38y2023i5p1453-1463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to pay brand premiums for generic medicines in Kenya: A bidding game experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Peter C. Rockers
  • Zana Wangari Kiragu
  • Monica A. Onyango
  • Richard O. Laing
  • Veronika J. Wirtz

Abstract

Background Recent growth in the market share of higher priced branded generic medicines in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) has raised concerns around affordability and access. We examined consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for branded versus unbranded generic non‐communicable disease (NCD) medicines in Kenya. Methods We randomly assigned NCD patients to receive a hypothetical offer for either a Novartis Access‐branded medicine or for an unbranded generic equivalent. We then analysed WTP data captured using a bidding game methodology. Results We found that WTP for Novartis Access medicines was on average 23% higher than for unbranded generic equivalents (p = 0.009). The WTP brand premium was driven almost entirely by wealthier patients. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the dominance of branded generics in LMICs like Kenya reflect in part consumer preferences for these medicines. Governments and other health sector actors may be justified in intervening to improve access to these medicines and equivalent non‐branded generics, particularly for the poorest patients who appear to have no preference for branded medicines.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter C. Rockers & Zana Wangari Kiragu & Monica A. Onyango & Richard O. Laing & Veronika J. Wirtz, 2023. "Willingness to pay brand premiums for generic medicines in Kenya: A bidding game experiment," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1453-1463, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:1453-1463
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3670
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul McNamee & Laura Ternent & Adjima Gbangou & David Newlands, 2010. "A game of two halves? Incentive incompatibility, starting point bias and the bidding game contingent valuation method," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 75-87, January.
    2. Livio Garattini & Katelijne Vooren, 2015. "Safety and Quality of Generic Drugs: A Never Ending Debate Fostered by Economic Interests?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 3-4, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergi Alonso & Khátia Munguambe & Elisa Sicuri, 2017. "Market for Artemether‐Lumefantrine to treat childhood malaria in a district of southern Mozambique," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 345-360, December.
    2. Phil Shackley & Simon Dixon, 2014. "The Random Card Sort Method And Respondent Certainty In Contingent Valuation: An Exploratory Investigation Of Range Bias," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(10), pages 1213-1223, October.
    3. Jacopo Bonan & Philippe LeMay-Boucher & Michel Tenikue, 2014. "Households' Willingness to Pay for Health Microinsurance and its Impact on Actual Take-up: Results from a Field Experiment in Senegal," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(10), pages 1445-1462, November.
    4. Laura Ternent & Aki Tsuchiya, 2013. "A Note on the Expected Biases in Conventional Iterative Health State Valuation Protocols," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(4), pages 544-546, May.
    5. Farr, Marina & Stoeckl, Natalie & Alam Beg, Rabiul, 2014. "The non-consumptive (tourism) ‘value’ of marine species in the Northern section of the Great Barrier Reef," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 89-103.
    6. Jan Olsen & Ole Røgeberg & Knut Stavem, 2012. "What Explains Willingness to Pay for Smoking-Cessation Treatments —Addiction Level, Quit-Rate Effectiveness or the Opening Bid?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(6), pages 407-415, November.
    7. Shono, Aiko & Kondo, Masahide & Ohmae, Hiroshi & Okubo, Ichiro, 2014. "Willingness to pay for public health services in rural Central Java, Indonesia: Methodological considerations when using the contingent valuation method," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 31-40.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:1453-1463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.