IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v38y2023i2p473-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The heterogeneity of public preferences for the first healthcare visit: A discrete choice experiment in the context of Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Hieu Thi Thanh Nguyen
  • Trung Quang Vo
  • Hien Thi Bich Tran
  • Binh Thanh Nguyen
  • Hiep Thanh Nguyen
  • Thoai Dang Nguyen
  • Luerat Anuratpanich

Abstract

Primary healthcare is critical in addressing the main health problems of communities. In Vietnam, the increasing healthcare demands cause major challenges, especially overcrowding. This study identified public preferences regarding the selection of healthcare facilities for first visit. A discrete choice online survey was generated from five attributes including visit duration, travel time, personal connection with medical staff, doctors' experience, and health insurance. A Dz‐efficient design constructed 36 choice sets, divided into three blocks of 12 choice sets. Each block formed one version of the questionnaire, which was randomly distributed to the participants. Heterogeneity in participant preferences was analysed by a latent class model with socio demographic characteristics and experiences of the last visit. 822 participants valued doctors' experience for both minor and severe symptoms. Preference heterogeneity for minor symptoms was quick service provision, highly experienced doctors, and payment through health insurance for the first (44.18%), second (32.17%), and third classes (23.66%), respectively. Regarding severe symptoms, they favoured all five attributes, quick health service, and reduced travel time for the first, second, and third classes, respectively (heterogeneities of 58.16%, 27.79%, and 14.05%, respectively). Predictions of choice from the worst to optimal healthcare facility scenario were 8.91%–61.91% and 10.16%–69.83% for minor and severe symptoms, respectively. Knowledge regarding public preference heterogeneity supports policymakers increase public acceptance in choosing primary healthcare facilities. Visit duration and doctors' experience should be considered a priority in decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Hieu Thi Thanh Nguyen & Trung Quang Vo & Hien Thi Bich Tran & Binh Thanh Nguyen & Hiep Thanh Nguyen & Thoai Dang Nguyen & Luerat Anuratpanich, 2023. "The heterogeneity of public preferences for the first healthcare visit: A discrete choice experiment in the context of Vietnam," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 473-493, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:2:p:473-493
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3597
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wensing, Michel & Jung, Hans Peter & Mainz, Jan & Olesen, Frede & Grol, Richard, 1998. "A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1573-1588, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yi & Ding, Shuai & Zheng, Handong & Zhang, Youtao & Yang, Shanlin, 2018. "Exploring diffusion strategies for mHealth promotion using evolutionary game model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 148-161.
    2. Ashill, Nicholas J. & Rod, Michel, 2011. "Burnout processes in non-clinical health service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1116-1127, October.
    3. Jiaqi Chen & Song Xu & Jing Gao, 2020. "The Mixed Effect of China’s New Health Care Reform on Health Insurance Coverage and the Efficiency of Health Service Utilisation: A Longitudinal Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Bramesfeld, Anke & Klippel, Ulrike & Seidel, Gabriele & Schwartz, Friedrich W. & Dierks, Marie-Luise, 2007. "How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 880-889, September.
    5. Wenhua Wang & Elizabeth Maitland & Stephen Nicholas & Jeannie Haggerty, 2019. "Determinants of Overall Satisfaction with Public Clinics in Rural China: Interpersonal Care Quality and Treatment Outcome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Meron Hirpa & Tinsay Woreta & Hilena Addis & Sosena Kebede, 2020. "What matters to patients? A timely question for value-based care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Wenhua Wang & Jeannie Haggerty & Ekaterina (Katya) Loban & Xiaoyun Liu, 2019. "Evaluating Primary Health Care Performance from User Perspective in China: Review of Survey Instruments and Implementation Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Andriy Danyliv & Milena Pavlova & Irena Gryga & Wim Groot, 2015. "Preferences for physician services in Ukraine: a discrete choice experiment," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 346-365, October.
    9. Pinika Patel & Sarah Bernays & Hankiz Dolan & Danielle Marie Muscat & Lyndal Trevena, 2021. "Communication Experiences in Primary Healthcare with Refugees and Asylum Seekers: A Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Nan Liu & Stacey R. Finkelstein & Margaret E. Kruk & David Rosenthal, 2018. "When Waiting to See a Doctor Is Less Irritating: Understanding Patient Preferences and Choice Behavior in Appointment Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1975-1996, May.
    11. Deng, Yewen & Li, Na & Jiang, Zhibin & Xie, Xiaoqing & Kong, Nan, 2021. "Optimal differential subsidy policy design for a workload-imbalanced outpatient care network," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Xiaojing Hu & Ping Wang, 2022. "Has China’s Healthcare Reform Reduced the Number of Patients in Large General Hospitals?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    13. Pundziene, Asta & Sermontyte-Baniule, Rima & Rialp-Criado, Josep & Chesbrough, Henry, 2023. "Indirect effect of open innovation on clinical and economic value creation in digital healthcare: A comparative study of European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Meek, Shelby Renee & Tietz, Matthias A., 2022. "Entrepreneurship and subjective vs objective institutional performance: A decade of US hospital data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    15. Noerreslet, Mikkel & Jemec, Gregor B.E. & Traulsen, Janine M., 2009. "Involuntary autonomy: Patients' perceptions of physicians, conventional medicines and risks in the management of atopic dermatitis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1409-1415, November.
    16. Randa Hemadeh & Rawan Hammoud & Ola Kdouh & Tarek Jaber & Lea Ammar, 2019. "Patient satisfaction with primary healthcare services in Lebanon," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 423-435, January.
    17. Chung, Vincent Chi Ho & Lau, Chun Hong & Wong, Eric Ming Chung & Yeoh, Eng Kiong & Griffiths, Sian Meryl, 2009. "Perceived quality of communication amongst outpatients in western and traditional Chinese medicine clinics in a Chinese population," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 66-72, April.
    18. Valentine, Nicole & Darby, Charles & Bonsel, Gouke J., 2008. "Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of "health systems responsiveness" in 41 countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1939-1950, May.
    19. Nananda F. Col & Andrew J. Solomon & Vicky Springmann & Calvin P. Garbin & Carolina Ionete & Lori Pbert & Enrique Alvarez & Brenda Tierman & Ashli Hopson & Christen Kutz & Idanis Berrios Morales & Car, 2018. "Whose Preferences Matter? A Patient-Centered Approach for Eliciting Treatment Goals," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1), pages 44-55, January.
    20. Weinhold, Ines & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "Rural - urban differences in determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 76-85.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:2:p:473-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.