IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v37y2022i5p2822-2835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Violence against health care workers in the workplace in Mozambique – An unrecognised managerial priority

Author

Listed:
  • Sérgio Roques Patrício
  • Paulo Ferrinho
  • Mohsin Sidat

Abstract

Introduction Recognition of the relevance of violence against health workers in their work place has been growing around the world. In Mozambique, workplace violence in the health sector needs better documentation. Therefore, this article is part of a study that describes the typology and the perceived impact of violence against health care workers in their workplace at the Lichinga Provincial Hospital and at the Health Centre of the City of Lichinga in 2019. Method This was an observational, descriptive, cross‐sectional study. The study was carried out in a simple random sample of health workers victims of violence at the Provincial Hospital and the Health Centre of the City of Lichinga, in the Province of Niassa in northern Mozambique. The questionnaire applied was adapted from the original developed by the International Labour Organization, the International Council of Nurse, the World Health Organization and Public Services International and applied in Maputo, Mozambique during 2002. Statistical analysis was carried out with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0 and WinPepi 11.65. Results Two hundred and 60 healthcare workers (HCW) were selected to participate, 180 agreed, 145 had inclusion criteria and five gave up participating in the study during the consent procedure. Thus, a total of 140 HCW answered the questionnaire. Predominant types of violence were: verbal threat/aggression 34% (n = 62/180); moral pressure/bullying/mobbing 30% (n = 54/180); ethnic discrimination 9% (n = 16/180); against personal property 6% (n = 10/180); physical 4% (n = 8/180); sexual harassment 4% (n = 8/180). One hundred and 37 victims reported 154 episodes of violence, where 7% (n = 13/180) reported more than one type of violence. Most victims reported no reaction (55%, n = 76/137) and few said that they confronted the offender (16%, n = 22/137, particularly victims of sexual harassment, 38%, n = 3/8). Most HCW reported non‐existence (39%, n = 54/137) or unawareness (32%, n = 44/137) of procedures to report violence within the Institution. Most (80%, n = 33/41) of those knowing about the procedures, knew how to use them. More than half (55%; n = 76/137) of HCW said that they were discouraged to report acts of violence. Conclusions Like for previous studies in Mozambique and elsewhere in Africa, the study confirms: a relatively high prevalence, a reluctance to talk about the issue and unawareness about procedures on how to report incidents. The findings reconfirm the necessity for the development and implementation of procedures to address violence incidents towards HCW, to develop support services for victims of health workplace violence. Like elsewhere in Africa, successive health workforce plans in Mozambique have failed to address this issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Sérgio Roques Patrício & Paulo Ferrinho & Mohsin Sidat, 2022. "Violence against health care workers in the workplace in Mozambique – An unrecognised managerial priority," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 2822-2835, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:5:p:2822-2835
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3506
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:5:p:2822-2835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.