IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v37y2022i3p1238-1251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of workplace violence against general practitioners: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kunming Tian
  • Xue Xiao
  • Rong Zeng
  • Wenqi Xia
  • Jing Feng
  • Yong Gan
  • Yuanzhong Zhou

Abstract

Global Conference on Primary Health Care identified that promoting the primary healthcare system has become an important work. Workplace violence (WPV) against GPs is an important global problem. This study aimed to summarise the evidence on the prevalence of WPV against GPs. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and the references of retrieved articles to identify studies on reporting the prevalence of WPV against GPs. We included 15 eligible studies in this meta‐analysis. 63.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 55.6%–70.6%) experienced any form of WPV, 33.8% (95% CI: 25.3%–42.3%) encountered non‐physical violence, and 8.5% (95% CI: 5.7%–11.4%) reported experiencing physical violence. The proportion of physical violence differed across study location, sex, and practice setting, and the prevalence of physical violence increased with study period. No significant differences in the prevalence of non‐physical violence in sex and study location were found. The prevalence of WPV against GPs is high. A higher prevalence of physical violence was found in some Asian countries (such as China), male GPs, and primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunming Tian & Xue Xiao & Rong Zeng & Wenqi Xia & Jing Feng & Yong Gan & Yuanzhong Zhou, 2022. "Prevalence of workplace violence against general practitioners: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 1238-1251, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:3:p:1238-1251
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:3:p:1238-1251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.