Primary care physician payment mechanisms toward universal health coverage: A study of Iran and selected countries

Background and aim Primary care physician (PCP) payment mechanisms can be important tools for addressing issues of access, quality, and equity in health care. The purpose of the present study is to compare the PCP payment mechanisms of Iran, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Thailand. Methods This is a descriptive‐comparative study comparing the PCP payment mechanisms of Iran and selected countries in 2020. Data for each country are collected from reliable databases and are tabulated to compare their payment models. Framework analysis is used for data analysis. Results The results are provided in terms of PCP payment mechanisms, adjusting factor for capitation, reasons for fee‐for‐service payment, the role of pay‐for‐performance (PFP) programme, domain and indicators, and reasons for developing PFP in each country. Conclusion The majority of the countries with high UHC service coverage index have applied a mix of PCP payment mechanisms, most of which include capitation and PFP. Moreover, adjusting capitation by factors such as age, sex, and health status will lead to provision of better services to high‐risk populations. In recent years, PFP has been paid to Iranian PCPs in addition to salary. Given the various existing models for primary health care in Iran and the increasing burden of chronic diseases, a more appropriate combination of payment mechanisms that create more incentives to provide active and high‐quality care should be developed. Also, when developing payment mechanisms, the required infrastructure such as electronic health record should be considered.