IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v34y2019i4p1109-1120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slovenian health care system and possibilities for freelance medical specialists

Author

Listed:
  • Boštjan Kušar
  • Dragica Maja Smrke
  • Mojca Bernik

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of the article is to present the results of the research aimed at establishing the current situation in the health care system in Slovenia and verifying whether the possibility and support exist for the introduction of a freelance medical specialist. Methods We conducted a survey among physicians and health care managers. The sample framework covered the total population of physicians and health care managers in Slovenia; surveys were completed by 318 physicians and 52 health care managers. Results The results of the quantitative research analysis provided an essential basis for and feedback information about possible areas for improving the current state of the health care system. The conclusions of semistructured interviews also considerably contributed to the elaboration of the freelance medical specialist proposal. Conclusion The findings of the research point out the need for changes in the Slovenian health care system and the support of the research participants in the implementation of the freelance medical specialist proposal. In the participants' opinions, the possibility of introducing freelance medical specialists would change the work organisation, particularly in terms of additional formalised possibilities for practising in the medical profession, which would further contribute to the overall improvement of the health care system.

Suggested Citation

  • Boštjan Kušar & Dragica Maja Smrke & Mojca Bernik, 2019. "Slovenian health care system and possibilities for freelance medical specialists," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1109-1120, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:4:p:1109-1120
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2766
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma Hodges & Sue Read, 2018. "How might organisational institutionalism support the challenges of the modern hospice?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 768-774, October.
    2. Robyn Lambert & Drew Carter & Naomi Burgess & Hossein Haji Ali Afzali, 2018. "The development of funding recommendations for health technologies at the state level: A South Australian case study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 806-822, October.
    3. Pedro Ramos & Hélio Alves, 2018. "Doctors' career choices in health systems constrained by national medical exams: A discrete choice experiment," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1211-1224, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mæhle, Per Magnus & Smeland, Sigbjørn, 2021. "Implementing cancer patient pathways in Scandinavia how structuring might affect the acceptance of a politically imposed reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1340-1350.
    2. Per Magnus Mæhle & Senada Hajdarevic & Erna Håland & Rikke Aarhus & Sigbjørn Smeland & Bjørn Erik Mørk, 2021. "Exploring the triggering process of a cancer care reform in three Scandinavian countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 2231-2247, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:4:p:1109-1120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.