IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v33y2018i3pe768-e780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborate across silos: Perceived barriers to integration of care for the elderly from the perspectives of service providers

Author

Listed:
  • Janice Ying‐Chui Lau
  • Eliza Lai‐Yi Wong
  • Roger Y. Chung
  • Stephen C.K. Law
  • Diane Threapleton
  • Nicole Kiang
  • Patsy Chau
  • Samuel Y.S. Wong
  • Jean Woo
  • Eng‐Kiong Yeoh

Abstract

Purpose To examine the barriers that hinder collaboration between health care and social care services and to report recommendations for effective collaboration to meet the growing support and care needs of our ageing population. Methods Data for this qualitative study were obtained from interviews with 7 key informants (n = 42) and 22 focus groups (n = 117) consisting of service providers who were from the health care or social care sectors and supporting elderly patients with multiple chronic diseases or long‐term care needs. Data collection was conducted from 2015 to 2016. The data were analysed using an inductive approach on the basis of thematic analysis. Findings Qualitative analysis reviewed a number of factors that play a significant role in setting up barriers at the operational level, including fragmentation and lack of sustainability of discharge programmes provided by non‐governmental organisations, lack of capacity of homes for the elderly, limitation of time and resources, and variation of roles in supporting end‐of‐life care decisions between the medical and social sectors. Other barriers are those of communication to be found at the structural level and perceptual ones that exist between professionals. Of these, perceptual barriers affect attitudes and create mistrust and interprofessional stereotypes and a hierarchy between the health care and social care sectors. Conclusion Health care and social care service providers recognise the need for collaborative work to enhance continuity of care and ageing in place; however, their efforts are hindered by the identified barriers that need to be dealt with in practical terms and by a change of policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice Ying‐Chui Lau & Eliza Lai‐Yi Wong & Roger Y. Chung & Stephen C.K. Law & Diane Threapleton & Nicole Kiang & Patsy Chau & Samuel Y.S. Wong & Jean Woo & Eng‐Kiong Yeoh, 2018. "Collaborate across silos: Perceived barriers to integration of care for the elderly from the perspectives of service providers," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 768-780, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:3:p:e768-e780
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2534
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Alex Jingwei & Tang, Vivien F.Y., 2021. "Integration of health services for the elderly in Asia: A scoping review of Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 351-362.
    2. Olin Oldeide & Elisabeth Fosse & Ingrid Holsen, 2019. "Collaboration for drug prevention: Is it possible in a “siloed” governmental structure?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1556-1568, October.
    3. Xiaodong Di & Lijian Wang & Xiuliang Dai & Liu Yang, 2020. "Assessing the Accessibility of Home-Based Healthcare Services for the Elderly: A Case from Shaanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:3:p:e768-e780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.