IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v48y2017i4p869-882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Network Analysis of Actors in Rural Development: A Case Study of Yanhe Village, Hubei Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Wang
  • Xiaoming Wang
  • Jingxia Wu
  • Guochao Zhao

Abstract

Agricultural production, rural areas, and farmers are three key aspects of agriculture related to sustainable economic and social development in China. Rural development is a process of multi†participation, which involves actors from governments, village committees, villagers, rural economic cooperatives, enterprises, financing institutions, and non†government organizations (NGOs). Based on social network analysis (SNA), this article analyzes the social network structures and characteristics of various actors in different stages of rural development in Yanhe village, Hubei Province, China. The results show that both the village committee and villagers have great influence on rural development; NGOs are the leaders of rural environmental improvement; village cooperatives are the promoters of rural economic development; enterprises are the accelerators of rural construction and development. The study outlines the rural development model in Yanhe village where the village committee is the leader and multiple forms of participation and cooperation are present; there are excellent partnerships and communication mechanisms among the participants. The endogenous and sustainable development model identified from Yanhe village is valuable for other villages in China to adopt.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Wang & Xiaoming Wang & Jingxia Wu & Guochao Zhao, 2017. "Social Network Analysis of Actors in Rural Development: A Case Study of Yanhe Village, Hubei Province, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 869-882, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:869-882
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.12195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12195
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.12195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiyao Zhou & Chen Qing & Shili Guo & Xin Deng & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2022. "Why “Say One Thing and Do Another” a Study on the Contradiction between Farmers’ Intention and Behavior of Garbage Classification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Quan Zhou & Kai Zhu & Ling Kang & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Tea Culture Tourism Perception: A Study on the Harmony of Importance and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Katarína Melichová & Lukáš Varecha, 2020. "Endogenous Political, Institutional, Cultural, and Geographic Determinants of Intermunicipal Cooperation—Evidence from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Yaojin Zhou & Yao Shen & Xuexi Yang & Zhifang Wang & Liyan Xu, 2021. "Where to Revitalize, and How? A Rural Typology Zoning for China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Yésica Mayett-Moreno & Liz Farleidy Villarraga-Flórez & Sandra Rodríguez-Piñeros, 2017. "Young Farmers’ Perceptions about Forest Management for Ecotourism as an Alternative for Development, in Puebla, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Jia Gao & Rongrong Zhao & Xiao Lyu, 2022. "Is There Herd Effect in Farmers’ Land Transfer Behavior?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Tian Tian & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Pursuing Development behind Heterogeneous Ideologies: Review of Six Evolving Themes and Narratives of Rural Planning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:869-882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.