IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v8y2017i4p569-573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Role for IPCC: Balancing Science and Society

Author

Listed:
  • Mukul Sanwal
  • Can Wang
  • Bo Wang
  • Yuan Yang

Abstract

There is a new role for global climate policy and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to support national implementation. For keeping within global ecological limits, public debate has shifted from concerns about the reliability of model†based climate projections to national legislators considering questions of when, where, and how to modify longer term trends. However, modeling remains the essential scientific tool by which the climate problem is defined assuming that society and the economy can be transformed, actually re†engineered, with relative ease. Inputs from the IPCC to the new governance process, the global ‘stocktake’, suggesting solutions will now influence deliberations between stakeholders, national actions and global cooperation. How best to shape a different science architecture and agenda linking science with both policy and society requires, for example, giving as much importance to reports of multilateral bodies and business consultancies as to peer†reviewed literature. This paper lays out some ideas how legitimacy can be maintained even as the IPCC recommends policy options and not just advice that is policy relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukul Sanwal & Can Wang & Bo Wang & Yuan Yang, 2017. "A New Role for IPCC: Balancing Science and Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(4), pages 569-573, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:4:p:569-573
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12470
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:4:p:569-573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.