IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025is1p25-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Design of Islamic Blended Microfinancing for Refugee Entrepreneurship: An Institutional Logic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Wahyu Jatmiko
  • A. Azizon
  • Raditya Sukmana

Abstract

Uncovering apt policy for refugee self‐reliance is intricate. Refugee entrepreneurship is often hailed as the way forward for such an objective as it deciphers ‘Canvas Ceiling’. However, the lack of financing for unfeasible and unbankable refugee entrepreneurs prevents this from materialising. This article proposes Islamic blended microfinance for refugee entrepreneurship, integrating state support, the private sector, the philanthropic funds, and Islamic values. Our model differs as it is developed through the lens of the competing logic discussed in the institutional theory. Understanding competing institutional logic is crucial as blended finance involves various agents with distinct moral preferences that are often overlooked by policymakers. We test our model in the spatial context of Indonesia, the home of microfinance and blended Islamic finance. The findings outline that the logics of the three agents and religion (Islam) can converge in contextuality and temporality dimensions. A key to attaining this equilibrium is to meticulously design the payoff between the private sector with market logic and the philanthropic institutions with universal community logic, making them contingent on the state of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wahyu Jatmiko & A. Azizon & Raditya Sukmana, 2025. "On the Design of Islamic Blended Microfinancing for Refugee Entrepreneurship: An Institutional Logic Perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(S1), pages 25-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:s1:p:25-37
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13475
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:s1:p:25-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.