IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024i4p676-688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing public health implications of free trade agreements: The comprehensive and progressive Trans‐Pacific Partnership Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Liz Green
  • Kath Ashton
  • Leah Silva
  • Courtney McNamara
  • Michael Fletcher
  • Louisa Petchey
  • Timo Clemens
  • Margaret Douglas

Abstract

In 2016, the United Kingdom voted to exit the European Union, which was surrounded by political and social uncertainty. The United Kingdom now negotiates its own trade agreements, and in March 2023, it agreed to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans‐Pacific Partnership Agreement (CPTPP). A health impact assessment (HIA) was undertaken in 2022–23 to predict the potential impact of the CPTPP on the health and well‐being of the Welsh Population. This paper explores the HIA findings and highlights the value of the approach in engaging with stakeholders and informing policymakers. This HIA followed a standard five‐step approach which involved a literature review to identify potential health impacts, qualitative interviews with cross‐sectoral stakeholders and the development of a community health profile. The HIA identified potential impacts across the wider determinants of health and specific vulnerable population groups. Investor state dispute settlement mechanisms, economic uncertainty and loss of regulatory policy space were identified as key pathways for health impacts. The findings have been beneficial in informing decision‐makers to prepare for the CPTPP in Wales using an evidence‐informed approach. This work has demonstrated the value of a HIA approach that uses a transparent process to mobilise a wide range of evidence, resulting in transferrable learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Liz Green & Kath Ashton & Leah Silva & Courtney McNamara & Michael Fletcher & Louisa Petchey & Timo Clemens & Margaret Douglas, 2024. "Assessing public health implications of free trade agreements: The comprehensive and progressive Trans‐Pacific Partnership Agreement," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(4), pages 676-688, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:676-688
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13381
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gleeson, Deborah & Lopert, Ruth & Reid, Papaarangi, 2013. "How the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement could undermine PHARMAC and threaten access to affordable medicines and health equity in New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 227-233.
    2. Barlow, Pepita & Sanap, Rujuta & Garde, Amandine & Winters, L. Alan & Mabhala, Mzwandile A. & Thow, Anne Marie, 2022. "Reassessing the health impacts of trade and investment agreements: a systematic review of quantitative studies, 2016–20," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113791, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia Ranald, 2015. "The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Reaching behind the border, challenging democracy," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 241-260, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:676-688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.