IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024i2p458-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciding which ‘developing’ country list to use: A practical guide

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Barros Leal Farias

Abstract

Researchers, policymakers and organisations sometimes need to explicitly classify countries as ‘developing’ or ‘developed’. The problem is that there are too many possible solutions. This short piece explores the developing/developed binary from an empirical perspective. The goal is to provide practical advice for choosing which list to use. It compares seven lists frequently used as reference for this classification, all based on material from these international organisations: World Bank, International Monetary Fund, three separate United Nations lists, as well as membership to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the Group of 77. These lists are compared by focusing on four elements: Purpose, Numbers, Criteria and Stability. Then, it compares these lists by explicitly outlining how each one classifies all countries in the world, per region. The piece fills a crucial empirical gap for those using the binary development‐based division by providing practical and useful advice for their decision‐making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Barros Leal Farias, 2024. "Deciding which ‘developing’ country list to use: A practical guide," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 458-464, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:458-464
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13328
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mattern, Janice Bially & Zarakol, Ayşe, 2016. "Hierarchies in World Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(3), pages 623-654, July.
    2. Doron Ella, 2020. "Categorization in international organizations," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 987-1015, November.
    3. Deborah Barros Leal Farias, 2023. "Country differentiation in the global environmental context: Who is ‘developing’ and according to what?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 253-269, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    2. Thomas Edward Flores & Gabriella Lloyd & Irfan Nooruddin, 2023. "When TED talks, does anyone listen? A new dataset on political leadership," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 169-199, January.
    3. Heimann, Gadi & Paikowsky, Deganit & Rabinowitz, Or, 2024. "Sneaking through raising walls: The dynamics of institutionalizing security technology clubs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Sarah Wolff & David Gazsi & Daniela Huber & Nora Fisher‐Onar, 2022. "How to Reflexively Decentre EU Foreign Policy: Dissonance and Contrapuntal Reconstruction in Migration, Religious and Neighbourhood Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1611-1628, November.
    5. Deborah Barros Leal Farias, 2023. "Country differentiation in the global environmental context: Who is ‘developing’ and according to what?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 253-269, September.
    6. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Faude, Benjamin, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Pål Røren, 2020. "On the Social Status of the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 706-722, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:458-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.