IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v13y2022i2p304-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Donkey Skin Trade: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Change

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Goodrum
  • Samuel Theuri
  • Eva Mutua
  • Gemma Carder

Abstract

The use of animal derivatives in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) dates back more than 5000 years. Donkey skins are one such animal derivative, the skins are used to produce ejiao, which is a luxury product and believed by some to have a variety of health benefits. The increasing demand for ejiao is putting the global donkey population at risk. In China between 1990 and 2018 the donkey population decreased by 77 per cent, as a consequence donkeys are largely being sourced from Africa to meet the demand. In low and middle‐income countries donkeys are a valuable livelihood asset. Research has emerged highlighting the potential detrimental impacts of the loss of donkeys on livelihoods. In addition to the impact on communities, the trade presents a number of signifcant health and welfare concerns to donkeys. Methods for raising awareness, reducing demand and challenging and enforcing policy are all needed to reduce the impact of the donkey skin trade. Policy change needs to be bottom up, with local bans in countries where the trade is most damaging and coordinated enforcement of legislation, including the tackling of illegal cross border trade. Partnership across non‐governmental organisations, agencies and government is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Goodrum & Samuel Theuri & Eva Mutua & Gemma Carder, 2022. "The Donkey Skin Trade: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 304-309, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:304-309
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13072
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao Liu & Zhigang Jiang & Hongxia Fang & Chunwang Li & Aizi Mi & Jing Chen & Xiaowei Zhang & Shaopeng Cui & Daiqiang Chen & Xiaoge Ping & Feng Li & Chunlin Li & Songhua Tang & Zhenhua Luo & Yan Zeng , 2016. "Perception, Price and Preference: Consumption and Protection of Wild Animals Used in Traditional Medicine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dias, Lucas Cardoso Corrêa & Cícero, Vinicius Curti, 2024. "Donkey business: trade, resource exploitation, crime and violence in a contestable market," OSF Preprints qreum, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rubino, Elena C. & Pienaar, Elizabeth F. & Soto, José R., 2018. "Structuring Legal Trade in Rhino Horn to Incentivize the Participation of South African Private Landowners," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 306-316.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:304-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.