IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v12y2021is6p93-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Big Digital Contact Tracing Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine de Bengy Puyvallée
  • Katerini Tagmatarchi Storeng

Abstract

Over a third of the world’s countries have launched contact‐tracing apps in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, generating much hype about the prospect of automating contact‐tracing to manage outbreaks and to alleviate costly and labour‐intensive ‘manual’ contact tracing. Despite the stringent scientific criteria applied to the development of vaccines and other ‘biomedical countermeasures’ in responding to the pandemic, digital contact tracing has been widely recommended despite being an unproven public health intervention. Evidence for its effectiveness is thin, based on theoretical mathematical modelling and unsystematic observations across diverse country contexts. Establishing evidence of effectiveness is complicated by the fact that two private corporations, Apple and Google, own the technology upon which most government contact‐tracing apps are based and which, by design, restricts access to needed data on privacy grounds. In this policy insight, we make the case for why public health authorities urgently need to establish the effectiveness and societal implications of this big digital contact‐tracing experiment.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine de Bengy Puyvallée & Katerini Tagmatarchi Storeng, 2021. "The Big Digital Contact Tracing Experiment," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S6), pages 93-96, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:s6:p:93-96
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12964
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dyani Lewis, 2020. "Why many countries failed at COVID contact-tracing — but some got it right," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7838), pages 384-387, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosanna Glazik & Hannah Moore & David Kennedy & Hilary Bower & Hana Rohan & Ashley Sharp & Anna C Seale, 2021. "A snapshot of the practicality and barriers to COVID-19 interventions: Public health and healthcare workers’ perceptions in high and low- and middle-income countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Rini Rachmawati & Estuning Tyas Wulan Mei & Idea Wening Nurani & Rizki Adriadi Ghiffari & Amandita Ainur Rohmah & Martina Ayu Sejati, 2021. "Innovation in Coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Best Practices from Five Smart Cities in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-30, November.
    3. Mohanty, Aatishya & Sharma, Swati, 2022. "COVID-19 regulations, culture, and the environment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Elena Riza & Eleni Kakalou & Evangelia Nitsa & Ioannis Hodges-Mameletzis & Paraskevi Goggolidou & Agis Terzidis & Eleni Cardoso & Karl Philipp Puchner & Zisimos Solomos & Anastasia Pikouli & Eleni-Pan, 2021. "Appraisal of a Contact Tracing Training Program for COVID-19 in Greece Focusing on Vulnerable Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Alex R. Cook & Kwok Pui Choi & Weng Kee Wong, 2022. "Alex R. Cook, Kwok Pui Choi and Weng Kee Wong's contribution to the ‘First Discussion Meeting on Statistical Aspects of the COVID‐19 Pandemic’," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1826-1827, October.
    6. Esra Ozdenerol & Rebecca Michelle Bingham-Byrne & Jacob Seboly, 2023. "Female Leadership during COVID-19: The Effectiveness of Diverse Approaches towards Mitigation Management during a Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(21), pages 1-36, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:s6:p:93-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.