IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v10y2019i4p733-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Regulatory Sandboxes to Support Responsible Innovation in the Humanitarian Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Martin
  • Giulia Balestra

Abstract

The global regulatory community continues to explore new approaches to supervising innovation. Among these, so‐called ‘regulatory sandboxes’ are proving to be particularly appealing to the financial sector as it seeks to promote technological and data‐driven innovation. These ‘playgrounds’ for innovation are also spreading to other regulated sectors such as telecommunications, data protection, energy, and environmental protection, allowing participants to test new business models and technologies under the supervision of regulators while the applicable rules are temporarily relaxed. Regulators can provide targeted guidance to sandbox participants, including help with understanding how an innovation fits within the existing regulatory framework. As of July 2019, at least 50 sandboxes were either in operation or under consideration globally. Significantly, many of these are based in countries that host large numbers of displaced persons. This commentary explores the potential role for sandboxes in promoting responsible humanitarian innovation. Through a review of the literature, we discuss the stated benefits of the sandbox approach while also acknowledging notable risks and challenges to their sustained deployment. We then reflect on how the humanitarian sector might engage regulators and other stakeholders through sandboxes to develop and catalyze innovations that better serve those affected by humanitarian crises, including the displaced.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Martin & Giulia Balestra, 2019. "Using Regulatory Sandboxes to Support Responsible Innovation in the Humanitarian Sector," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(4), pages 733-736, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:733-736
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12729
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:733-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.