IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v10y2019i4p712-714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How City‐networks are Shaping and Failing Innovations in Urban Institutions for Sustainability and Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Niki Frantzeskaki

Abstract

The seminal piece of Davidson, Coenen and Gleeson gives a good overview of the role of C40 as a global intermediary for establishing networked governance and knowledge brokerage of cities. The identified benefits for cities participating and even driving city networks are well presented, however require a closer conceptual and empirical development that also considers evidence and reflection from the institutional work of other transnational networks such as ICLEI, Climate Alliance, Asian Climate Change Cities Resilience Network, 100 Resilience Cities as well as the Covenant of Mayors and UCLG. In this response article we extend the conceptualization of the benefits and risks for the roles of city‐networks as curators of institutional spaces for co‐creation and knowledge co‐production to respond to the third theme of Davidson, Coenen and Gleeson paper on the ways that city networks shape urban institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Niki Frantzeskaki, 2019. "How City‐networks are Shaping and Failing Innovations in Urban Institutions for Sustainability and Resilience," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(4), pages 712-714, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:712-714
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:712-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.