IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/germec/v15y2014i1p62-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Debt in Post-1850 German Economic Thought vis-à-vis the Pre-1850 British Classical School

Author

Listed:
  • Carl-Ludwig Holtfrerich

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="geer12026-abs-0001"> The positions of British and German economists on public debt in the long nineteenth century differed substantially from each other. Whereas British classical economists regarded any public debt as ruinous for the country, German economists promoted debt accumulation for productivity-enhancing public investment and current outlays with benefits for future fiscal years. This article summarizes the positions of the most prominent British economists before 1850, David Hume, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Thomas R. Malthus and John Stuart Mill, and deals more extensively with those of their German colleagues Carl Dietzel, Lorenz von Stein and Adolph Wagner after 1855.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl-Ludwig Holtfrerich, 2014. "Public Debt in Post-1850 German Economic Thought vis-à-vis the Pre-1850 British Classical School," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 15(1), pages 62-83, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:germec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:62-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/geer.2014.15.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:germec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:62-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfsocea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.