IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v32y2025i1p243-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responding to economic abuse: An institutional logics analysis of feminist activism

Author

Listed:
  • Orly Benjamin
  • Dalit Yassour‐Borochowitz
  • Arianne Renan Barzilay

Abstract

Economic abuse (EA)—intimate partners' efforts to control women's economic resources—still suffers from ambiguous legal recognition. Even in countries with legal recognition, state allocation of resources for support remains meager. We suggest that Israeli state welfare organizations (SWOs) employees have developed their professional response to EA along two distinct value sets—a dominant institutional logic in their respective organizations and a more covert feminist institutional logic encountered in collaborations with feminist Non Governmental Organizations. Using a framework of multiple institutional logics, in interviews with 48 SWO employees, we map the multiple institutional logics that cultivate responses to EA survivors and show that elements of feminist understanding and practices on EA permeate SWOs' practices. The existence of a feminist institutional logic creates a path for exploring whether the feminist impact is significant in enabling committed responses to EA even while no institutional change is achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Orly Benjamin & Dalit Yassour‐Borochowitz & Arianne Renan Barzilay, 2025. "Responding to economic abuse: An institutional logics analysis of feminist activism," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 243-258, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:243-258
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.13144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13144
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.13144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:243-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.