IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v31y2024i6p2351-2370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender‐role preference matters: How family policy dissemination affects marriage/fertility intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Senhu Wang
  • Shun Gong

Abstract

Despite a wide range of family policies, marriage and fertility rates in Japan remain very low among developed countries. Drawing on data from a national survey experiment, this study aims to examine whether dissemination of existing family policies can increase marriage and fertility intentions of Japanese young individuals and whether the effect depends on their gender‐role preferences. The results show that informing and/or reminding respondents of the existing family policies can significantly increase their marriage intention, but not their fertility intention. Moreover, the effect on marriage intention is moderated by their gender‐role expectations for future spouses. Specifically, the policy information effect is more pronounced among women who expect a relatively equal share of financial responsibilities and among men who expect their future wives to assume the primary housework responsibilities. This suggests that although existing family policies may lower marriage costs for economically independent women, the same policies could potentially exacerbate domestic gender inequalities and women's work‐life conflicts by helping less domestically engaged men enter into marriage. Overall, these findings contribute to the feminist literature on gender and family by highlighting the potential consequences of family policies on the pre‐marriage mechanisms of domestic gender inequalities and calling for actions to change men's traditional gender ideology.

Suggested Citation

  • Senhu Wang & Shun Gong, 2024. "Gender‐role preference matters: How family policy dissemination affects marriage/fertility intentions," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2351-2370, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:6:p:2351-2370
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12963
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12963?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:6:p:2351-2370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.