IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v31y2024i3p768-796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faculty allyship: Differences by gender, race, and rank at a single U.S. University

Author

Listed:
  • Hyun Kyoung Ro
  • Blaze Campbell‐Jacobs
  • Ellen M. Broido
  • Lisa K. Hanasono
  • Deborah A. O’Neil
  • Margaret M. Yacobucci
  • Karen V. Root

Abstract

Within the growing literature about allyship in the workplace, few studies have specifically addressed faculty allyship for faculty colleagues. Previous studies on faculty allyship for inclusive academic environments address only men's contributions as allies. Using an expansive definition of faculty allyship and including any faculty members with membership in at least one dominant social group, we sought to better understand how faculty members perceive allyship, their concerns about allyship, and how those perceptions vary by gender, race, and rank. We examined the responses of faculty who participated in an allyship training program that was offered at a university in Ohio, USA as part of a National Science Foundation ADVANCE grant intended to reduce gender inequity among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics faculty. We framed this study by employing Hardiman et al.'s (2007) three‐dimensional matrix of oppression and used a mixed‐method research design. Participants' primary concerns about engaging in allyship related to their academic rank. We offer several implications for policies, practices, and future research on faculty allyship for faculty colleagues by considering positional power and rank as well as race and gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyun Kyoung Ro & Blaze Campbell‐Jacobs & Ellen M. Broido & Lisa K. Hanasono & Deborah A. O’Neil & Margaret M. Yacobucci & Karen V. Root, 2024. "Faculty allyship: Differences by gender, race, and rank at a single U.S. University," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 768-796, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:768-796
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12988
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:768-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.