IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v30y2023i6p1922-1940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amplifying inequalities: Gendered perceptions of work flexibility and the division of household labor during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Rinaldo
  • Ian Michael Whalen

Abstract

During the COVID‐19 pandemic in the US, mothers have taken on more of the responsibility for childcare (including remote schooling) and housework. How did dual‐income couples negotiate domestic labor during the pandemic in ways that ended up with women taking on a larger role? Based on in‐depth interviews with 33 parents, we found that men's jobs were often discussed as being more demanding, particularly in their need for protected time, or requiring rigid time commitments, while women's work was considered more flexible and able to accommodate childcare needs. We argue that gendered perceptions about the flexibility of paid work shaped couple's negotiations over the division of labor. While many interviewees considered men's jobs as “simply more demanding,” we propose that this is a gendered perception that reflects entrenched cultural norms that associate masculinity with paid work and thus men's paid work is prioritized in many families.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Rinaldo & Ian Michael Whalen, 2023. "Amplifying inequalities: Gendered perceptions of work flexibility and the division of household labor during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 1922-1940, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:6:p:1922-1940
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.13026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.13026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:6:p:1922-1940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.