IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v27y2020i2p181-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a performative understanding of deservingness: Merit, gender and the BBC pay dispute

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Simpson
  • Savita Kumra
  • Patricia Lewis
  • Nick Rumens

Abstract

Drawing largely on a high‐profile case of unequal pay at the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) as an illustrative example, this conceptual article considers differences and interrelationships between merit and deservingness, where the latter captures how, through appropriate performances, merit is given recognition and value. We propose a performative understanding of deservingness that highlights its gendered and embodied dimensions. Informed by Judith Butler's account of gender performativity, we show that, while merit is conventionally conceptualized as a relatively fixed set of attributes (qualifications, skill) 'attached' to the individual, deservingness captures how, in gendered terms, value and recognition are both claimed and conferred. As we argue, a gendered, deserving subject does not pre‐exist but is performatively constituted through embodied practices and performances of what is seen as worthy in a particular time and place.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Simpson & Savita Kumra & Patricia Lewis & Nick Rumens, 2020. "Towards a performative understanding of deservingness: Merit, gender and the BBC pay dispute," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 181-197, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:181-197
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12397
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:181-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.