IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v26y2019i5p668-687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variations of the same? A sectoral analysis of the gender pay gap in Germany and Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Nadja Bergmann
  • Alexandra Scheele
  • Claudia Sorger

Abstract

Germany and Austria are two countries with a comparably and persistently high gender pay gap. Further, both countries are classified as conservative welfare states where the male breadwinner model has been only partly modernized and strong corporatist structures shape working conditions. At the same time, welfare policy and provision are not only based on but also shape gender‐related norms, beliefs and assumptions that are virulent for job valuation and collective bargaining. Against this background the article analyses similarities and differences regarding the gender pay gap in Germany and Austria. While both countries show significant similarities regarding the causes for the gender pay gap, there are some differences regarding legislation and further policies with which the gender pay gap could be reduced. Arguing that the institutional framework strongly influences income opportunities for women and men, the article provides a sectoral analysis of the financial and insurance sector and the human health sector in both countries. Using qualitative data from a recent research project, it is argued that in the classification of a sector as ‘female’, the sectoral income level combined with different wage‐setting mechanisms have a crucial impact on wage inequalities between women and men.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadja Bergmann & Alexandra Scheele & Claudia Sorger, 2019. "Variations of the same? A sectoral analysis of the gender pay gap in Germany and Austria," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 668-687, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:668-687
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12299
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clotilde Coron, 2020. "Equal pay index for men and women: The performative power of quantification conventions," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1418-1437, November.
    2. Bader, Anna Katharina & Froese, Fabian Jintae & Cooke, Fang Lee & Schuster, Tassilo, 2022. "Gender diversity management in foreign subsidiaries: A comparative study in Germany and Japan," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).
    3. Clotilde Coron & Géraldine Schmidt, 2023. "Sex, breadwinner status, and perceived job insecurity: A comparative analysis in Europe," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 1052-1083, November.
    4. Bhuvanachithra Chidambaram & Joachim Scheiner, 2021. "Leisure Quality among German Parents—Exploring Urbanity, Mobility, and Partner Interaction as Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Núria Sánchez-Mira & Raquel Serrano Olivares & Pilar Carrasquer Oto, 2022. "What slips through the cracks: The distance between regulations and practices shaping the gender pay gap," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 536-558, May.
    6. Fernandes, Mario & Hilber, Simon & Sturm, Jan-Egbert & Walter, Andreas, 2023. "Closing the gender gap in academia? Evidence from an affirmative action program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:668-687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.