IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v26y2019i12p1730-1748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joan Acker's influence on Management and Organization Studies: Review, analysis and directions for the future

Author

Listed:
  • Stella M. Nkomo
  • Jenny K. Rodriguez

Abstract

This paper pays tribute to Joan Acker by discussing how her ideas have been utilized in Management and Organization Studies (MOS). Through a systematic review of journal articles citing Acker's scholarship from 2000 to 2017 (September), we show how recent scholarship has used Acker to advance discussions in the field and examine how her work was received, and which promises made by her work are still to be met. We identify avenues to carry her legacy forward with a view to realizing the transformative goal she posed as central to meaningful change in social, political and economic life through scholarship in the field of gender and organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Stella M. Nkomo & Jenny K. Rodriguez, 2019. "Joan Acker's influence on Management and Organization Studies: Review, analysis and directions for the future," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(12), pages 1730-1748, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:12:p:1730-1748
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12237
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lilas Al‐Asfahani & Gail Hebson & Mike Bresnen, 2024. "Reinforced or disrupted ideal worker norms in the pandemic? Analyzing the gendered impact of the pandemic on professional specialisms in a Professional Services Firm in Kuwait," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 644-665, March.
    2. Eline Jammaers & Astrid Huopalainen, 2023. "“I prefer working with mares, like women, difficult in character but go the extra mile”: A study of multiple inequalities in equine (sports) business," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2049-2068, November.
    3. Camille Allard & Grace J. Whitfield, 2024. "Guilt, care, and the ideal worker: Comparing guilt among working carers and care workers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 666-682, March.
    4. Trudy Bates, 2022. "Rethinking how we work with Acker's theory of gendered organizations: An abductive approach for feminist empirical research," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1041-1064, July.
    5. Ghazal Mir Zulfiqar, 2022. "Inequality Regimes, Patriarchal Connectivity, and the Elusive Right to Own Land for Women in Pakistan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 799-811, May.
    6. Julie Rowlands & Jill Blackmore & Andrea Gallant, 2020. "Enacting leadership professional development and the impediments to organizational and industry change in rural and regional Australia," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1269-1284, November.
    7. Dorian R. Woods & Yvonne Benschop & Marieke van den Brink, 2022. "What is intersectional equality? A definition and goal of equality for organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 92-109, January.
    8. Mona Zanhour & Dana McDaniel Sumpter, 2024. "The entrenchment of the ideal worker norm during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from working mothers in the United States," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 625-643, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:12:p:1730-1748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.