IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v78y2025i1p87-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non‐market production and household income in nineteenth‐century Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Joyce Burnette

Abstract

While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth‐century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non‐market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non‐market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyce Burnette, 2025. "How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non‐market production and household income in nineteenth‐century Europe," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 78(1), pages 87-112, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:78:y:2025:i:1:p:87-112
    DOI: 10.1111/ehr.13339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13339
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ehr.13339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:78:y:2025:i:1:p:87-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.