IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v72y2019i4p1229-1250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the personal–anonymous divide: agency relations in powers of attorney in France in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries

Author

Listed:
  • Fabien Eloire
  • Claire Lemercier
  • Veronica Aoki Santarosa

Abstract

Powers of attorney are often interpreted as evidence of trust among the parties involved. We build a novel dataset of notarized powers of attorney, capturing a wide variety of agency relationships in four large French commercial cities in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, to test hypotheses on the relational basis of economic relationships. We find little support for the idea of a radical shift from personal to anonymous relationships during our period. Our results point to more nuanced transformations. The preference for proxies in the same occupation as the principal somewhat declined, while professional proxies emerged and principals used relational chains, especially involving notaries, to find proxies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabien Eloire & Claire Lemercier & Veronica Aoki Santarosa, 2019. "Beyond the personal–anonymous divide: agency relations in powers of attorney in France in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1229-1250, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:72:y:2019:i:4:p:1229-1250
    DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12784
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ehr.12784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:72:y:2019:i:4:p:1229-1250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.