IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v69y2016i4p1057-1082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming–Qing China

Author

Listed:
  • Kent Deng
  • Patrick O'Brien

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kent Deng & Patrick O'Brien, 2016. "Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming–Qing China," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1057-1082, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:69:y:2016:i:4:p:1057-1082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ehr.2016.69.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Kent & O'Brien, Patrick, 2021. "The Kuznetsian paradigm for the study of modern economic history and the Great Divergence with appendices of literature review and statistical data," Economic History Working Papers 108563, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    2. Liu, Dr Ziang, 2024. "Wages, labour markets, and living standards in China, 1530-1840," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121169, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Liu, Ziang, 2022. "Wages, labour market, and living standards in China, 1530-1840," Economic History Working Papers 115031, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    4. Philip T. Hoffman, 2020. "The Great Divergence: Why Britain Industrialised First," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 126-147, July.
    5. Deng, Kent & O'Brien, Patrick, 2021. "The Kuznetsian paradigm for the study of modern economic history and the Great Divergence with appendices of literature review and statistical data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108563, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Wang, Yuton & Guo, Jingyuan & Deng, Kent, 2023. "Inputs, outputs and living standards in rural China during the 1920s and 30s: a quantitative analysis," Economic History Working Papers 120277, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    7. Liu, Ziang, 2024. "Wages, labour markets, and living standards in China, 1530–1840," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Deng, Kent & O'Brien, Patrick, 2017. "How Well Did Facts Travel to Support Protracted Debate on the History of the Great Divergence between Western Europe and Imperial China?," MPRA Paper 77276, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:69:y:2016:i:4:p:1057-1082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.