IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v63y2010i2p362-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South Carolina indigo, European textiles, and the British Atlantic economy in the eighteenth century

Author

Listed:
  • R. C. NASH

Abstract

Europe's indigo imports grew rapidly from the 1720s, but the mid‐century wars (1739–48, 1756–63) had a devastating effect on the European textile industries and hence on the indigo trade. Britain's indigo market, however, boomed in wartime on the bases of prize indigo captured from France and Spain and of indigo imported from South Carolina. The rise of South Carolina's trade from the mid‐1740s was not caused, as the historiography claims, by its monopoly of the British market—such a monopoly never existed—but because the depression in South Carolina's major staple, rice, compelled a remodelling of the South Carolina plantation system, which produced an elastic supply of indigo. Carolina indigo was blighted by a poor reputation, not, as is usually argued, because British merchants maligned unfairly its quality, but because Carolina planters failed to achieve consistent production standards. Carolina indigo nevertheless succeeded in displacing French and Spanish indigo in the British and in some continental markets, reflecting the demand for cheap dyestuffs from manufacturers of low‐cost textiles, the fastest‐growing sectors of the European textile industries at the onset of industrialization.

Suggested Citation

  • R. C. Nash, 2010. "South Carolina indigo, European textiles, and the British Atlantic economy in the eighteenth century," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 63(2), pages 362-392, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:63:y:2010:i:2:p:362-392
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00487.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00487.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00487.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. C. Nash, 1992. "South Carolina and the Atlantic economy in the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 45(4), pages 677-702, November.
    2. Mancall, Peter C. & Rosenbloom, Joshua L. & Weiss, Thomas, 2002. "Agricultural labor productivity in the Lower South, 1720-1800," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 390-424, October.
    3. Susan Fairlie, 1965. "Dyestuffs in the Eighteenth Century," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 17(3), pages 488-510, April.
    4. Deane, Phyllis, 1957. "The Output of the British Woolen Industry in the Eighteenth Century," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 207-223, June.
    5. Ralph Davis, 1967. "Aleppo and Devonshire Square," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-00557-4, March.
    6. A. H. John, 1965. "Miles Nightingale - Drysalter," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 18(1), pages 152-163, August.
    7. Alden, Dauril, 1965. "The Growth and Decline of Indigo Production in Colonial Brazil: A Study in Comparative Economic History," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 35-60, March.
    8. Eltis, David & Lewis, Frank D. & Richardson, David, 2006. "Slave Prices, the African Slave Trade, and Productivity in Eighteenth-Century South Carolina: A Reassessment," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 66(4), pages 1054-1065, December.
    9. Kisch, Herbert, 1989. "From Domestic Manufacture to Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Rhineland Textile Districts," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195051117, Decembrie.
    10. Thomson,J. K. J., 1992. "A Distinctive Industrialization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521394826, November.
    11. Price, Jacob M., 1964. "The Economic Growth of the Chesapeake and the European Market, 1697–1775," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 496-511, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bonfatti, Roberto, 2017. "The sustainability of empire in a global perspective: The role of international trade patterns," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 137-156.
    2. Hornborg, Alf, 2006. "Footprints in the cotton fields: The Industrial Revolution as time-space appropriation and environmental load displacement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 74-81, August.
    3. Daron Acemoglu & Davide Cantoni & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2011. "The Consequences of Radical Reform: The French Revolution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3286-3307, December.
    4. Robinson, James A., 2010. "Elites and Institutional Persistence," WIDER Working Paper Series 085, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Maixé-Altés, J. Carles & Iglesias, Emma M., 2009. "Domestic monetary transfers and the inland bill of exchange markets in Spain (1775-1885)," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 496-521, April.
    6. Richard Grassby, 1970. "The Personal Wealth of the Business Community in Seventeenth-Century England," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 23(2), pages 220-234, August.
    7. Mancall, Peter C. & Rosenbloom, Joshua L. & Weiss, Thomas, 2002. "Agricultural labor productivity in the Lower South, 1720-1800," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 390-424, October.
    8. Peter C. Mancall & Joshua L. Rosenbloom & Thomas Weiss, 2000. "Slave Prices in the Lower South, 1722-1815," NBER Historical Working Papers 0120, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Peter Mancall & Joshua Rosenbloom & Thomas J. Weiss, 2008. "Commodity Exports, Invisible Exports and Terms of Trade for the Middle Colonies, 1720 to 1775," NBER Working Papers 14334, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Alexander Donges & Jean-Marie Meier & Rui C. Silva, 2023. "The Impact of Institutions on Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 1951-1974, April.
    11. Cohen, Stephen & Fields, Gary, 1998. "Social Capital and Capital Gains, or Virtual Bowling in Silicon Valley," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt200968vh, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    12. Gerlach, Stefan & Stuart, Rebecca, 2021. "Commodity Prices and Global Inflation, 1851-1913," CEPR Discussion Papers 16526, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Natalia Mora Sitja, 2002. "Labour and Wages in Pre-Industrial Catalonia," Economics Series Working Papers 2002-W45, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    14. Joshua L. Rosenbloom, 2008. "Technology Evolution," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 200805, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2008.
    15. Munro, John H., 2005. "I panni di lana: Nascita, espansione e declino dell’industria tessile di lana italiana, 1100-1730 [The woollen cloth industry in Italy: The rise, expansion, and decline of the Italian cloth industr," MPRA Paper 11038, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2006.
    16. James Robinson, 2010. "Elites and Institutional Persistence," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2010-085, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Peter C. Mancall & Joshua L. Rosenbloom & Thomas Weiss, 2000. "South Carolina Slave Prices, 1722-1809," NBER Historical Working Papers 0123, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Julio Martínez-Galarraga & Marc Prat, 2014. "Wages and prices in early Catalan industrialisation," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2014/305, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    19. Lecce, Giampaolo & Ogliari, Laura, 2019. "Institutional Transplant and Cultural Proximity: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Prussia," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1060-1093, December.
    20. Keith Sugden & Sebastian A.J. Keibek & Leigh Shaw-Taylor, "undated". "Adam Smith revisited: coal and the location of the woollen manufacture in England before mechanization, c. 1500-1820," Working Papers 33, Department of Economic and Social History at the University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:63:y:2010:i:2:p:362-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.