IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v38y1985i3p352-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Were the Tax Assessments of Domesday England Artificial? The Case of Essex

Author

Listed:
  • JOHN McDONALD
  • G. D. SNOOKS

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • JOHN McDONALD & G. D. SNOOKS, 1985. "Were the Tax Assessments of Domesday England Artificial? The Case of Essex," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 38(3), pages 352-372, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:38:y:1985:i:3:p:352-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1985.tb00376.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moreno-Cruz, Juan & Taylor, M. Scott, 2020. "Food, Fuel and the Domesday Economy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Jones, Michael John, 2018. "Domesday book: An early fiscal, accounting narrative?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 275-290.
    3. John McDonald, 1997. "Manorial Efficiency in Domesday England," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 199-213, May.
    4. John McDonald, 2012. "The relative efficiency of king's, ecclesiastical, and lay estates in Domesday Essex, 1086," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(3), pages 250-269, November.
    5. McDonald, John & Snooks, G. D., 1986. "Domesday Economy: A New Approach to Anglo-Norman History," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198285243.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:38:y:1985:i:3:p:352-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.