IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v50y1974i4p581-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note on the Gain from Trade

Author

Listed:
  • J. S. Metcalfe
  • Ian Steedman

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. S. Metcalfe & Ian Steedman, 1974. "A Note on the Gain from Trade," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 50(4), pages 581-595, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:50:y:1974:i:4:p:581-595
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1974.tb00207.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1974.tb00207.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1974.tb00207.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Bruno & Edwin Burmeister & Eytan Sheshinski, 1966. "The Nature and Implications of the Reswitching of Techniques," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(4), pages 526-553.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cláudio Gontijo, 2000. "The Ricardian theory of international trade: a criticism," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG td141, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    2. Asim Erdilek, 1977. "The Problem of Deadweight Loss in the International Trade of Growing Capitalist Economies," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 113(II), pages 171-191, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilip Madan & Eugene Seneta, 1990. "On the monotonicity of the labour-capital ratio in Sraffa's model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 101-107, February.
    2. Saverio M. Fratini, 2010. "Reswitching And Decreasing Demand For Capital," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 676-682, November.
    3. Kazuhiro Kurose & Naoki Yoshihara, 2018. "The Heckscher—Ohlin—Samuelson Trade Theory and the Cambridge Capital Controversies: On the Validity of Factor Price Equalisation Theorem," Working Papers SDES-2018-17, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Nov 2018.
    4. Kurose, Kazuhiro & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2016. "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model and the Cambridge Capital Controversies," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2016-05, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    5. Carlo Milana, 2019. "Solving the Reswitching Paradox in the Sraffian Theory of Capital," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 97-125, November.
    6. James E. Foster & Tapan Mitra, 2003. "Ranking investment projects," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 22(3), pages 469-494, October.
    7. Mariolis, Theodore, 2010. "A neo-Ricardian critique of the traditional static theory of trade, customs unions and common markets," MPRA Paper 23088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Cameron Harwick, 2022. "Unmixing the metaphors of Austrian capital theory," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 163-176, June.
    9. Michael Osborne & Ian Davidson, 2016. "The Cambridge capital controversies: contributions from the complex plane," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 251-269, April.
    10. Zambelli, Stefano & Fredholm, Thomas & Venkatachalam, Ragupathy, 2017. "Robust measurement of national technological progress," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 38-55.
    11. Carlo Milana, 2019. "Refuting Samuelson's Capitulation on the Re-switching of Techniques in the Cambridge Capital Controversy," Papers 1912.01250, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    12. Stefano Zambelli, 2014. "Aggregate Production Functions and Neoclassical Properties: An Empirical Verification," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1405, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    13. Saverio M. Fratini, 2019. "On The Second Stage Of The Cambridge Capital Controversy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1073-1093, September.
    14. Bidard, Christian & Salvadori, Neri, 1995. "Duality between prices and techniques," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 379-389, June.
    15. Ulrich van Suntum, "undated". "Dynamic Efficiency and Reswitching," Working Papers 200122, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.
    16. Kurose, Kazuhiro & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2018. "The Heckscher—Ohlin—Samuelson Trade Theory and the Cambridge Capital Controversies: On the Validity of Factor Price Equalisation Theorem," Discussion Paper Series 686, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:50:y:1974:i:4:p:581-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.