IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v37y2025i1p169-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of comment letters on audit fees: Evidence from spillover effect

Author

Listed:
  • Wuqing Wu
  • Huixuan Zhang
  • Yuan George Shan

Abstract

This study examines whether comment letters have spillover effects on audit fees. By examining listed companies in China, we find that the frequency of comment letters received by peer firms is positively associated with focal firms' audit fees. The spillover effect is stronger when companies have the same audit firm as their peers and the comment letter is longer, asks more questions, is more negative, or contains more risk information. Furthermore, the effect is more pronounced (weaker) for companies with higher growth (audited by Big Four audit firms). Our findings suggest that comment letters have regulatory effectiveness, which influences companies' and auditors' behavior on a large scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Wuqing Wu & Huixuan Zhang & Yuan George Shan, 2025. "The impact of comment letters on audit fees: Evidence from spillover effect," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 169-200, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:169-200
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12314
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:169-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.