IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v36y2024i3p1143-1163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does enterprise digital transformation affect audit opinion type?—Based on business evidence of Chinese listed companies

Author

Listed:
  • XiaoHong Dong
  • YinWei Jiang

Abstract

Utilizing text analysis through machine learning techniques, this study investigates the influence of enterprise digital transformation on audit opinions within China's A‐share listed companies spanning from 2011 to 2020. The findings underscore that enterprise digital transformation has the potential to bolster standard unqualified audit opinions through the enhancement of internal control quality and information transparency. Additionally, factors such as marketization level, property rights nature, and industry classification are found to be pivotal in shaping this relationship. These research outcomes not only extend the theoretical horizons of audit opinion studies but also offer valuable insights and recommendations for auditors to optimize the efficacy of audit opinions.

Suggested Citation

  • XiaoHong Dong & YinWei Jiang, 2024. "Does enterprise digital transformation affect audit opinion type?—Based on business evidence of Chinese listed companies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 1143-1163, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:1143-1163
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12284
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:1143-1163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.