IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econpa/v34y2015i4p229-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stop the Boats: Do the Ends Justify the Means?

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Menzies

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="ecpa12113-abs-0001"> The Stop the Boats policy towards irregular maritime arrivals (boat people) is to process prospective refugee-status claimants in non-judicial prisons, without the prospect of ultimate Australian abode, with the aim of stopping further boat people coming to Australia. The numbers of people involved to date are small, as are the economic impacts. Stop the Boats appears to succeed on its own terms, but it faces the pitfalls of “ends justify the means” consequentialist ethics, favoured by economists and others. Chief among these are that there are no obvious moral limits in pursuing desirable ends, such as stopping deaths at sea.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Menzies, 2015. "Stop the Boats: Do the Ends Justify the Means?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 34(4), pages 229-242, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:34:y:2015:i:4:p:229-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecpa.2015.34.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalie Herold & Michael A. Kortt & Brian Dollery, 2016. "If It Ain't Broke: An Evaluation of the Australian Asylum Program under Rudd and Gillard," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(3), pages 230-244, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:34:y:2015:i:4:p:229-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.