IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v82y2015i326p350-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Comparative Advantages of Firms, Markets and Contracts: a Unified Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Birger Wernerfelt

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="ecca12109-abs-0001"> The most efficient labour market mechanism depends on the advantages of specialization, workers’ costs of switching between entrepreneurs, and the frequency with which needs change. Multilateral mechanisms are more efficient when specialization is more advantageous, when it is cheap for workers to switch between entrepreneurs, and when individual entrepreneurs cannot occupy a worker on a full-time basis. Given a bilateral mechanism, employment (a firm) is more efficient than contracts when in-process adjustments arise more frequently. There exist three regions in which firms, markets and sequences of bilateral contracts are weakly more efficient than all other mechanisms in a big class.

Suggested Citation

  • Birger Wernerfelt, 2015. "The Comparative Advantages of Firms, Markets and Contracts: a Unified Theory," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82(326), pages 350-367, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:82:y:2015:i:326:p:350-367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecca.2015.82.issue-326
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Birger Wernerfelt & Alvin Silk & Shuyi Yu, 2021. "Internalization of Advertising Services: Testing a Theory of the Firm," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 946-963, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:82:y:2015:i:326:p:350-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.