IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v54y1987i216p505-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LM3 Surprises and Asset Prices

Author

Listed:
  • MacDonald, Ronald
  • Torrance, Thomas S

Abstract

In this paper, the relationship between unanticipated sterling M3 and a variety of asset prices is investigated for part of the United Kingdom's experience with monetary targeting using survey data. It is demonstrated that the U.K. survey data are r ational in that they are an unbiased and efficient forecast, and that the market efficiently incorporates unanticipated money growth into asset prices. The sign of the unanticipated monetary component in our asset-price equations tends to indicate that the Fisher (or inflatio n expectations) hypothesis is well supported during the sample period. Copyright 1987 by The Review of Economic Studies Limited.

Suggested Citation

  • MacDonald, Ronald & Torrance, Thomas S, 1987. "LM3 Surprises and Asset Prices," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 54(216), pages 505-515, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:54:y:1987:i:216:p:505-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0427%28198711%292%3A54%3A216%3C505%3ASAAP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drummond, Michael & Stoddart, Greg, 1995. "Assessment of health producing measures across different sectors," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 219-231, September.
    2. Drummond, Michael & Jonsson, Bengt & Rutten, Frans, 1997. "The role of economic evaluation in the pricing and reimbursement of medicines," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 199-215, June.
    3. Johannesson, Magnus & O'Conor, Richard M., 1997. "Cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 241-253, March.
    4. Fox-Rushby, Julia A. & Foord, Frances, 1996. "Costs, effects and cost-effectiveness analysis of a mobile maternal health care service in West Kiang, The Gambia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 123-143, February.
    5. Johnnesson, Magnus, 1995. "Economic evaluation of health care and policymaking," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 179-190, September.
    6. Blumenschein, Karen & Johannesson, Magnus, 1996. "Incorporating quality of life changes into economic evaluations of health care: an overview," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 155-166, May.
    7. Johannesson, Magnus & Johansson, Per-Olov, 1997. "A note on prevention versus cure," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 181-187, September.
    8. Maynard, Alan & Bloor, Karen, 1995. "Primary care and health care reform: the need to reflect before reforming," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 171-181, March.
    9. Baltussen, Rob & Ament, Andre & Leidl, Reiner, 1996. "Making cost assessments based on RCTs more useful to decision-makers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 163-183, September.
    10. Gerard, Karen & Smoker, Irenie & Seymour, Janelle, 1999. "Raising the quality of cost-utility analyses: lessons learnt and still to learn," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 217-238, March.
    11. Szeto, Kam Leong & Devlin, Nancy J., 1996. "The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 101-115, November.
    12. Monrad Aas, I. H., 1995. "Incentives and financing methods," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 205-220, December.
    13. Salkeld, Glenn & Phongsavan, Philayrath & Oldenburg, Brian & Johannesson, Magnus & Convery, Paula & Graham-Clarke, Peita & Walker, Sheila & Shaw, John, 1997. "The cost-effectiveness of a cardiovascular risk reduction program in general practice," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 105-119, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:54:y:1987:i:216:p:505-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.