IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecnote/v43y2014i2p167-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Loan Portfolio Optimization by Importance Sampling Techniques: Evidence on Italian Banking Books

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Di Clemente

Abstract

type="main"> The aim of this work is to explore how importance sampling (IS) techniques may improve internal banking portfolio optimization models. The current economic downturn contributes to an increase in the credit risk amount of the loan portfolios reducing the quality of the banking credit. In such a difficult economic context, characterized by the credit crunch phenomenon, robust and stable methodologies of credit portfolio risk minimization, based on ‘enhanced’ Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) portfolio models, may encourage Italian banks to finance the real economy by lending also during risky and uncertain economic conditions. For these reasons, our investigation focuses on Italian banking books composed of credit loans to the 23 Italian non-financial economic sectors. In order to reduce the high volatilities both of the estimates of the credit portfolio's tail risk and of the optimal solutions in terms of credit asset allocations, we combine a two-step IS technique with a MCS model in a context of credit portfolio's Conditional Value at Risk minimization. The performance of this improved credit portfolio optimization model, in terms of accuracy of the estimates, has been investigated for the sample Italian loan portfolio in two different phases of the economic cycle, precisely before and during the current financial and economic crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Di Clemente, 2014. "Improving Loan Portfolio Optimization by Importance Sampling Techniques: Evidence on Italian Banking Books," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 43(2), pages 167-191, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecnote:v:43:y:2014:i:2:p:167-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecnote:v:43:y:2014:i:2:p:167-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0391-5026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.