IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecinqu/v49y2011i4p1098-1103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possibility Of Dying As A Unified Explanation Of Why We Discount The Future, Get Weaker With Age, And Display Risk‐Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • BHAGWAN CHOWDHRY

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhagwan Chowdhry, 2011. "Possibility Of Dying As A Unified Explanation Of Why We Discount The Future, Get Weaker With Age, And Display Risk‐Aversion," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 49(4), pages 1098-1103, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:49:y:2011:i:4:p:1098-1103
    DOI: j.1465-7295.2009.00271.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00271.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1465-7295.2009.00271.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David K. Levine & Salvatore Modica & Federico Weinschelbaum & Felipe Zurita, 2015. "Evolution of Impatience: The Example of the Farmer-Sheriff Game," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 295-317, August.
    2. Lo, Louis Yi-Shih & Lin, Sheng-Wei & Hsu, Li-Yi, 2016. "Motivation for online impulse buying: A two-factor theory perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 759-772.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:49:y:2011:i:4:p:1098-1103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.