IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v42y2024i1ne12729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenging the formality bias: The organization of informal work, working relations, and collective agency in Kenya and Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Lone Riisgaard
  • Nina Torm
  • Godbertha Kinyondo
  • Winnie Mitullah
  • Anne Kamau
  • Aloyce Gervas
  • Raphael Indimuli

Abstract

Motivation Formal social protection systems, such as health insurance and representation, are often biased in favour of formal workers, thereby excluding most of the world's working population who make a living in the informal economy. Purpose The article extends existing critiques of formality bias by investigating the reality of work for people in the informal economy in Kenya and Tanzania and analysing related social protection challenges. Specifically, we look at: (1) the governance of work; (2) the organization of work relations; and (3) collective agency. In terms of social protection, we focus on formal and informal forms of social insurance and representation. Methods and approach We draw on interview and survey data from people working in micro trading, transport, and construction in Nairobi and Kisumu in Kenya, and Dar es Salaam and Dodoma in Tanzania. A total of 1,462 workers were surveyed and 24 focus group discussions were held with such workers. Interviews were conducted with 120 key informants: leaders and members of informal workers' associations in the three sectors, as well as representatives of authorities, trade unions, and business associations. Data were collected from June 2018 to December 2019. Findings Formal social insurance and representation do not fit the real experience of most people working in the informal economy. They have been modelled on and designed to support workers in formal standard employment relations. At the same time, informal workers' associations play important roles in meeting—albeit inadequately—the social insurance and representational needs of their members. Policy implications Meaningful engagement with the reality of work and collective agency in the informal economy is necessary to inform more appropriate policies and measures to provide informal workers with appropriate social protection measures, particularly social insurance and representation. Their reality should not have to conform to an inadequate model; rather, the model should fit their reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Lone Riisgaard & Nina Torm & Godbertha Kinyondo & Winnie Mitullah & Anne Kamau & Aloyce Gervas & Raphael Indimuli, 2024. "Challenging the formality bias: The organization of informal work, working relations, and collective agency in Kenya and Tanzania," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:1:n:e12729
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12729
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitullah, Winnie V. & Njeri Wachira, Isabella., 2003. "Informal labour in the construction industry in Kenya a case study of Nairobi," ILO Working Papers 995164748402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. Jonathan Morduch & Manohar Sharma, 2002. "Strengthening Public Safety Nets from the Bottom Up," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 569-588, November.
    3. Martha Chen & Sophie Plagerson & Laura Alfers, 2022. "A new social contract inclusive of informal workers," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-49, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Rizzo, Matteo, 2017. "Taken For A Ride: Grounding Neoliberalism, Precarious Labour, and Public Transport in an African Metropolis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198794240.
    5. Roosa Lambin & Milla Nyyssölä, 2022. "Exploring social policy trajectories in Mainland Tanzania: Driving for gender-inclusive development?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-38, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. repec:ilo:ilowps:486930 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Amrita Chhachhi & Jan Breman & Marcel Linden, 2014. "Informalizing the Economy: The Return of the Social Question at a Global Level," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 920-940, September.
    8. Mitullah, Winnie V. & Njeri Wachira, Isabella., 2003. "Informal labour in the construction industry in Kenya : a case study of Nairobi," ILO Working Papers 994869303402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. Muinde, Jacinta Victoria S. & Prince, Ruth Jane, 2023. "A new universalism? Universal health coverage and debates about rights, solidarity and inequality in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    10. Jill Wells, 2007. "Informality in the construction sector in developing countries," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 87-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samwel Alananga Sanga & Justine Mselle, 2018. "Informal Construction Practices as Knowledge Incubators: A Conceptual Framework," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 13-37, March.
    2. Titus Kivaa Mbiti & Nick Blismas & Ron Wakefield & Ric Lombardo, 2011. "System archetypes underlying the problematic behaviour of construction activity in Kenya," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 3-13.
    3. Joshua Greenstein, 2020. "The Precariat Class Structure and Income Inequality among US Workers: 1980–2018," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 447-469, September.
    4. Begum, Ismat & Alam, Mohammad & Haque, M., 2015. "Productive Impacts of Cash Transfer and Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in Bangladesh: Propensity Score Matching Analysisi," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211215, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Omer Ozgen, 2020. "Impact of Slum Redevelopment Projects on Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from Addis Ababa," CSAE Working Paper Series 2020-23, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    6. Rebecca L. Thornton & Laurel E. Hatt & Erica M. Field & Mursaleena Islam & Freddy Solís Diaz & Martha Azucena González, 2010. "Social security health insurance for the informal sector in Nicaragua: a randomized evaluation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(S1), pages 181-206, September.
    7. Itay Noy, 2023. "Unpicking Precarity: Informal Work in Eastern India's Coal Mining Tracts," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(1), pages 168-191, January.
    8. Rina Agarwala, 2017. "Using legal empowerment for labour rights in India," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-57, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Babu, Suresh Chandra, 2002. "Social Safety Nets for Poverty Reduction in South Asia – Global Experiences," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 5, pages 1-9.
    10. Stefan Dercon (QEH), "undated". "Risk, Growth and Poverty: what do we know, what do we need to know?," QEH Working Papers qehwps148, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    11. Francesca Coin & Marco Marrone, 2018. "Ambivalence. Luci e ombre del lavoro digitale," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 25-35.
    12. Lucy Baker, 2021. "Everyday experiences of digital financial inclusion in India's ‘micro-entrepreneur’ paratransit services," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1810-1827, October.
    13. Jill Wells, 2007. "Informality in the construction sector in developing countries," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 87-93.
    14. Veronika Nagy, 2018. "The Janus face of precarity – Securitisation of Roma mobility in the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(2), pages 127-146, March.
    15. Nogueira, Mara & Shin, Hyun Bang, 2022. "The “right to the city centre”: political struggles of street vendors in Belo Horizonte, Brazil," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116876, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Priyansha Singh & Chitra Rawat & Varun Aggarwal & Manish Maskara, 2020. "“Employers” in a Migrant Intensive Industry: Organised Construction in Thane, Maharashtra," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 63(4), pages 1183-1201, December.
    17. Andy Sumner & Richard Mallett, 2013. "Capturing Multidimensionality: What does a Human Wellbeing Conceptual Framework Add to the Analysis of Vulnerability?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 671-690, September.
    18. Vivien Kana Zeumo & Blaise Some & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2011. "A survey on Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: a Decision Aiding Perspective," Working Papers hal-00875525, HAL.
    19. Nogueira, Mara & Shin, Hyun Bang, 2020. "The right to the city centre: political struggles of street vendors in Belo Horizonte, Brazil," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105867, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Nihan Yıldırım & Derya Gultekin & Doğan Tilkici & Dilek Ay, 2022. "An Institutional System Proposal for Advanced Occupational Safety and Labor Standards in the Turkish Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-31, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:1:n:e12729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.