Author
Abstract
Motivation International donors commit around USD 2 billion every year to Pacific Island Countries (PICs). While the donors intend to help develop the Pacific, few of the projects they fund involve any more local involvement in their selection and planning beyond consultation with selected, often elite, or small groups of locals. It is even rarer to find projects that are localized or locally‐led. Purpose We ask whether it is possible to do more to localize donor‐funded development in the Pacific. We ask if co‐design between foreign and local specialists can localize development, by giving locals more agency, and by prioritizing indigenous knowledge. Specifically, we review the Pacific eLearning Programme (PeP), funded by New Zealand and implemented in the Cook Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. The programme works with Ministries of Education to design science content that reflects the country context for some ten or so schools in each nation. Co‐design includes use of indigenous dialogue [talanoa / tok stori / storian] to share, debate and learn between foreign and local specialists, and between specialists across the four countries. Methods and approach Evidence was gathered from pre‐ and post‐programme surveys. Further data was collected from comments written by the local co‐designers. Findings We found that kinship formed between locals and foreigners, based on mutual respect for the knowledge each group brought. This process empowered locals, valued their expertize and knowledge, and reduced dependency by prioritizing indigenous and local knowledge. Localization led to mutually beneficial outcomes. Policy implications Creation and implementation of policies that mandate localization through recruitment, use of indigenous methodologies, co‐design and recognition of local skills, knowledge and culture will help create trust with development partners, empower locals, exchange skills and knowledge between locals and foreigners, and reduce dependency.
Suggested Citation
Artila Devi, 2023.
"How co‐design can localize development programmes and reduce dependency: Examples from Pacific Island Countries,"
Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:s2:n:e12763
DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12763
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:s2:n:e12763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.