IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v40y2022i1ne12544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybridization of Chinese international development volunteering: Evidence from three state‐funded programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Qianjin Zhang
  • Junjie Lin
  • Tianyang Liu
  • Guang Chen

Abstract

Motivation In the field of international development assistance, China has been undergoing a transition from being a receiving to a sending country. In addition to growing its foreign aid budget, China has been making great efforts to send volunteers to serve overseas. To date, however, there has been relatively little research on the expansion of China’s international development volunteering (IDV) actions. Purpose This exploratory study examines the characteristics of IDV programmes initiated and funded by the Chinese government. Specifically, we investigate how various IDV mechanisms have been developed to incorporate specific actors, and analyse how these arrangements serve the sponsors’ interests. Approach and methods We use a qualitative case‐study approach and conduct in‐depth analyses on three influential state‐funded IDV programmes. Data were collected from semi‐structured interviews and secondary documentary materials. Findings Research findings from three Chinese IDV programmes indicate that the hybridization dynamics of IDV are reflected in their different programme mechanisms, whereby intra‐, non‐ and extra‐state actors from international, central and local levels are connected as contributors. Volunteer resources are transformed, through different mechanisms, into development resources to benefit the hosting countries, and into public diplomacy resources, technical resources, and human capital for the sponsors’ own interests. Policy implications This study highlights the hybrid nature of state‐funded IDV practices and shows the evolution of Chinese IDV from traditional official‐to‐official linkages to more diverse and spontaneous forms involving different non‐state actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianjin Zhang & Junjie Lin & Tianyang Liu & Guang Chen, 2022. "Hybridization of Chinese international development volunteering: Evidence from three state‐funded programmes," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:1:n:e12544
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12544
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Mayer, 2001. "Data mining: a reconsideration," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 183-194.
    2. Brautigam, Deborah, 2011. "The Dragon's Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199606290.
    3. Carol Wise, 2003. "Neoliberalismo y reconstrucción del Estado," Chapters of Books, in: Carol Wise (ed.), Reinventando el Estado: estrategia económica y cambio institucional en el Perú, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 233-288, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico.
    4. Jennifer Y.J. Hsu & Timothy Hildebrandt & Reza Hasmath, 2016. "‘Going Out’ or Staying In? The Expansion of Chinese NGOs in Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(3), pages 423-439, May.
    5. Thomas Mayer, 2001. "Data mining: a reconsideration," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 183-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Colander, 2000. "New Millennium Economics: How Did It Get This Way, and What Way Is It?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 121-132, Winter.
    2. Kristen Jones, 2024. "Colombia's role in great power competition," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S3), pages 120-129, June.
    3. Yiping Cai, 2024. "Between co‐optation and emancipation: Chinese women's NGOs and power shifts at the United Nations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 148-158, May.
    4. Samuel Brazys, 2023. "Axel Dreher, Andreas Fuchs, Bradley Parks, Austin Strange and Michael J. Tierney. 2022. Banking on Beijing: The Aims and Impacts of China’s Overseas Development Program. (Cambridge: Cambridge Universi," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 227-231, January.
    5. Dollar, David, 2017. "United States-China two-way direct investment: Opportunities and challenges," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 14-26.
    6. Lucy Corkin, 2011. "Redefining Foreign Policy Impulses toward Africa: The Roles of the MFA, the MOFCOM and China Exim Bank," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 40(4), pages 61-90.
    7. Giles Mohan, 2021. "Below the Belt? Territory and Development in China's International Rise," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 54-75, January.
    8. Gregor Dobler, 2017. "China and Namibia, 1990 to 2015: how a new actor changes the dynamics of political economy," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(153), pages 449-465, July.
    9. Bhavna Dave & Yuka Kobayashi, 2018. "China’s silk road economic belt initiative in Central Asia: economic and security implications," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 267-281, September.
    10. William G. Martin & Ravi Arvind Palat, 2014. "Asian Land Acquisitions in Africa: Beyond the ‘New Bandung’ or a ‘New Colonialism’?," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 3(1), pages 125-150, April.
    11. Hoeffler, Anke & Sterck, Olivier, 2022. "Is Chinese aid different?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Amavilah, Voxi Heinrich, 2012. "The Caldwellian Methodological Pluralism: Wishful Thoughts and Personal Tendencies," MPRA Paper 44656, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Feb 2013.
    13. Ye Jin & Qingning Lin & Shiping Mao, 2022. "Tanzanian Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Improved Maize Technology: Analyzing Influencing Factors Using SEM and fsQCA Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Bert Jacobs, 2011. "A Dragon and a Dove? A Comparative Overview of Chinese and European Trade Relations with Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 40(4), pages 17-60.
    15. Eunhye Yoo, 2021. "Chinese Development Finance and its determinants: Does global governance matter?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(3), pages 471-492, May.
    16. Israel Nyaburi Nyadera & Billy Agwanda & Michael Otieno Kisaka, 2020. "Beyond the Yuan: Rethinking China’s Attractiveness to Africa," China Report, , vol. 56(4), pages 429-446, November.
    17. Han, Xia & Lukoianove, Tatiana & Zhao, Shasha & Liu, Xiaohui, 2024. "International relations in international business research: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Landry, David, 2018. "The risks and rewards of resource-for-infrastructure deals: Lessons from the Congo's Sicomines agreement," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 165-174.
    19. Ho-fung Hung, 2018. "The tapestry of Chinese capital in the Global South," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    20. Wang, Mingchu & Wei, Yingqi & Azumah, Gideon & Wang, Catherine L., 2024. "African returnees in international knowledge transfer: A social capital perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:1:n:e12544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.