IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v34y2016i5p671-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to poverty reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Zahabia Saleem
  • John A. Donaldson

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="dpr12167-abs-0001"> Of the myriad approaches to reducing poverty, which have proved effective on a national scale? This article analyses 15 systematically selected national cases of demonstrated rapid poverty reduction, seeking insights into effective approaches to reducing poverty. From these 15 economies, in which the bottom quintile experienced an annual increase in income of at least 6% over at least a decade, emerge four poverty-reduction pathways: (1) industrialisation, (2) rural development, (3) social welfare and (4) petroleum-generated employment. In addition to helping us understand what policy approaches have actually helped reduce poverty, this article has implications for the understanding of economic growth, the impact of pro-growth policies, the relationship between state and market, and the roles of non-government organisations (NGOs) and civil society.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahabia Saleem & John A. Donaldson, 2016. "Pathways to poverty reduction," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(5), pages 671-690, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:34:y:2016:i:5:p:671-690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/dpr.2016.34.issue-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Zhu & Chuanmin Shuai & Xiaoyan Wang & Zhihui Leng & Fan Zhang, 2019. "Analysis of China’s policy effect on poverty alleviation: evidence from Chongqing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1325-1345, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:34:y:2016:i:5:p:671-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.